Reply to thread

Quite right. And I intend to say that a stupid idea is indeed, stupid.


Duh?




Regular logic??? There are various forms of logic, fyi, none of which is anything similar to your 'agnostic' nonsense. I'm not even sure if it is at all fair to call your nonsense agnosticism.


Duh?




We already know how time and space curves. You are free to ask aliens for help regarding that, if you wish.


Duh?




I'm quite sure alien 'genesis' has already been discarded for various scientific reasons.


 


No need to google. I know what it means. Unfortunately, I can't say the same for you.


Duh?




Nothing in the political theory of john locke (which is the basis of the american government) has anything to do with empirical truth.


Unless, of course, you have some empirical evidence as to the 'equality of men', or the 'inalienability of certain rights', or perhaps the absolute nature of the body politic.


Duh?




Not at all. It is quite evident you are not using your head. Might you be using another part of your anatomy in lieu of critical thought, one may wonder?




Correct. Anyone may or may not have a different interpretation of the same immutable truth. What is common to ALL religions is the belief in the existence of a power, both immanent and emminent.


Duh?




Excluding scientology, all religions believe in some sort of a first cause that is beyond the real, common-sense, material world. They all got that right, now, didn't they?




It was a perfect analogy. Human subjectivity attaches different meanings to the exact same thing.




Survival?


The highest manifestation of religion is when one subverts his own life in the pursuit of a higher goal outside himself -- which contradicts 'survival'.


Duh?




Over and over and over to the point of absurdity. If you cannot understand what science is saying, what makes you so sure it is true? Oh, I forgot, you're agnostic.


Duh?




You might want to get off it yourself. And you might want to take your stupid friend dawks with you.


The first cause isn't contingent on something else. That is why it is said to be necessary. It cannot NOT EXIST. That is why it is infinite. Otherwise, it would have come from nothing, or it wouldn't be the first -- which is what your space-time singularity suggests.


Duh?




Of course it is open. In fact, it is so open, air passes through it at will.




Oh, it doesn't matter if you use little or big words. The truth is independent of your comprehension of it. The fact that you use little words only demonstrates the state of your comprehension.




I'm certainly not a part of your pretend-agnostic group, if that's what you mean.


Back
Top