The many worlds interpretation was dismissed on philosophical grounds. In a September 2007 conference[9] David Wallace reports on a proof by DeuThe many worlds interpretation offers the possibility of deriving the probability interpretation of quantum mechanics from other assumptions. In fact, this was first done by Everett and DeWitt in the 1950s, but the old argument was criticized on philosophical tsch and himself of the Born Rule starting from Everettian assumptions[10] and this has been reported in the press as support for parallel universes.[11][12]....
....The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed a process of "collapse" in which an indeterminate quantum system would probabilistically collapse down onto, or select, just one determinate outcome to "explain" this phenomenon of observation. Wavefunction collapse was widely regarded as artificial and ad-hoc, so an alternative interpretation in which the behavior of measurement could be understood from more fundamental physical principles was considered desirable.
Everett's Ph.D. work provided such an alternative interpretation. Everett noted that for a composite system (for example that formed by a particle interacting with a measuring apparatus, or more generally by a subject (the "observer") observing an object (the "observed" system) the statement that a subsystem (i.e. the observer or the observed) has a well-defined state is meaningless -- in modern parlance the subsystem states have become entangled -- we can only specify the state of one subsystem relative to the state of the other subsystem, i.e. the state of the observer and the observed are correlated. This led Everett to derive from the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone (i.e. without assuming wavefunction collapse) the notion of a relativity of states of one subsystem relative to another.
Everett noticed that the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone decreed that after an observation is made each element of the quantum superposition of the combined subject-object wavefunction contains two relative states: a "collapsed" object state and an associated observer who has observed the same collapsed outcome; what the observer sees and the state of the object are correlated. The subsequent evolution of each pair of relative subject-object states proceeds with complete indifference as to the presence or absence of the other elements, as if wavefunction collapse has occurred, which has the consequence that later observations are always consistent with the earlier observations. Thus the appearance of the object's wavefunction's collapse has emerged from the unitary, deterministic theory itself. (This answered Einstein's early criticism of quantum theory, that the theory should define what is observed, not for the observables to define the theory[19] .)....”
Get it? What you observe is relative to the state of the object or thing observed so you act upon and believe the appearance alone not what is reality. Working on my own i developed a theory and an equation that then supports Bruce Cathie's work on physical harmonic uniformity only my own reason people, your conscious. It reasons metaphysical harmonic convergence. Ready?
LOL! i had ZERO idea other people had done some of this work. what I observed was not what you believed to be reality as you were conditioned to believe a lie nor was it supported by another belief system - science, as science, especially dogma, is nothing but a subjective belief system for the most part. NOBODY 'believed' Everett and they call Tegmark a crackpot, lol! Well, none of you believed I was entered and heard in US supreme court as i overturned Bush v gore but I did or else...
I never would have been on the docket once let alone twice. HOW ELSE DO YOU GET IN AS ORIGINAL JURISDICTION??? By granting that standing, the court was admitting my case could only be adjudicated in US Supreme Court as it not only overturns Bush v Gore but proves 'God' and unites faith and reason.