P.S. MAX TEGMARK:
YOU OWE ME AN APOLOGY. I TOLD YOU LIFE IS PROOF AND AS YOU'RE MARRIED WHO TOLD YOU LIFE WAS ALL MALE OR ONLY MALE OR THAT PEOPLE WEREN'T PHOTONS IF THEY WERE FEMALE???? I'VE BEEN WATCHING YOU GUYS SHOOT PHOTONS AT THINGS FOR AGES & SPENDING BILLIONS ON IT LAUGHING THE WHOLE TIME AS YOU ARE SUBJECTIVE MALE OBSERVERS PRETENDING TO BE OBJECTIVE. I saw you a couple of days ago on PBS with Hugh Everett's son. If you talk to him anytime soon let him know that when I saw him sitting on one of those proches I fell out of my chair as I dreamed about that exact porch and he only I had no idea who he was as this dream was a few years ago. I walked up to that porch, down that leafy street, then onto that porch, and was talking to a person - him - but I did not know the identity of the person and we were not talking probabilities as it is. He was sitting in a lounge chair and we were discussing something very seriously. Dreams can and do become realized as you create your reality and as you already know the future - if you acknowldge it. Personally I do not like knowing the future so I do not acknowledge it as the future - yet, as it is, isn't i? I plead ignorant to the future at least for a little while longer. You have to ask Hamilton about his dreams. His dreams blow anything I've ever dreamed out of the water - literally. Wait 'til you hear about his wacky life and his dreams and how he had zero clue that he allowed a dead parrot to escalate into a parrot autopsy with people arguing if it was dead as in Whose fault is this dead parrot? I'm the wounded fisher king, with a real wound, only i'm fishigng for men not actual fish as actual fish are a dime a dozen, and he's telling me he needs unconditional love so he must argue dead parrots w/o revealing WHO he is. He tried to get me to believe the dead parrot was an actual crusuade, lol. I'm screaming you have just defied all known 'laws' of physics, what we think is real, with that dream and your life and he's quietly demanding they autopsy the parrot not him...Trust me, I not once took my eyes or my ears off of him, screw the dead parrot and/or the refund, lol. Bee colony collapse disorder? American colony collapse disorder. If it wasn't so funny, if this parrot was not dead, I mean alive, I'd weep. As you are not American by birth I forgive you, as you may not have ever been told you ARE a constitution and an institution but always a constitution first and foremost and that should always be your objective observer observing. You'll be able to know, 'Neils Bohr has a motive as does his photon. His photon meant to do that! It knows Bohr is the issue not itself. Bohr has consequences but the photon doesn't.' . THEN, after you become equally protected and duly processed, as you do it to yourself, you have all of the answers. lol. 
P.P.S. Mr. biocentric stem cell guy? The one the Pope rallies against? You too owe me an apology. Only we never met so you have an excuse. The Pope should rally against you as you have made your existence known. Hello! If it is biocentric you have to actually do something to then exist, correct? Maybe, maybe not. Is your argument a fetus is not a person as it has never been seen or is not known as I knew my kids way before they were born. One even had a name BEFORE I had sex. Biocentrism is flawed so you ate a whole lot of frozen spinach for...something as I did too so I knew you were incorrect. Seriously, I too took the poverty, frozen spinach, canned beans and pudding packs will teach you more than college or expensive equipment route. I knew you existed and were real as a person gave me a subscription ot Discover and so I actually met you without your knowledge. You can bring me 500 cops with 16 year old sons who are going blind and I still will not create and then kill a fetus that is a person or possesses the opportunity to become one when it did not before I intervened as WHO told you blindness was a bad thing and a disability? There's an actual reason for blindness. You really have issues with your Mom and you will never know the fact of you - your own existence - until you deal with that as it is wholly related to your refusal to acknowledge ETHICS. You are subject to them not excepted from them. Ethics do not cease to exist once you are not looking at the paper or your license as once you own knowledge you own it. The moon? Watch this: I'm not looking at it and I do not believe we traveled to it in the same manner buddhists do not believe it, as in you do not believe enlightenment can be achieved in one lifetime but we, buddhists, do not believe you went to the moon. Did you? Can we? Did I? LOL! The fact that you argued the existence of the moon PROVES it is reality wheter we are looking at it or not. Now, if I was blind I might never actually see it but I could still know it exists based upon YOU and your IDEA, couldn't I? I mean, are you arguing blind people see nothing so they do not exist as this world does not only as they are not looking directly at it? Is that biocentrism??? 'Cause if it is you are incorrect. Close but no cigar. I forgive you as you're a man and messed up to boot too. I can fix that if you want me to as I know how. I do not expect you to 'believe' me or that I exist. LOL! I'll 'fix' Hamilton first so you'll have proof of my skills, lollololol! Then I can and will 'fix' you. I promised God I'd 'fix' Hamilton first. The secret is: it has to be by your will. But - there are lots of ways I can get you there. 
The secret is: ignorance is not then nonexistence. A thing can exist but you may be ignorant of it, or, until you or another person actually finds it we have no idea it is existing so it actually is but we merely have not come to own the knowledge. As time is, that thing was and will be. We create it by seeking it as it is our idea of what might be. We look assuming it is there. If nothing else, think of it like this: Be angry with your Mom and Dad. They thought you into existence didn't they? Accident by design or deliberation you are here, aren't you? You had MIT. Me? I had me, period, I didn't even have Tegmark and its partly his own theory, and I'm not angry so what's your reason as you have no excuse? There's no Id in biocentrism as it was reasoned to me. No matter what I write or what you or I believe, and no matter where we stand, the moon? It is as we created it. Do not even get me started on uncreating, you know, changing the past? After all, we do celebrate the SIGNING of the Declaration on the 4th and that is not the past, or is it? Go see: check a book of HISTORY. A school textbook. They all changed as I changed the 'past', get it? So did history change or did all of you? HISTORY, as people live history. I changed your biocentric 'past', your biocentric self, by making you forget as I willed it into being by acting upon that idea - the 4th instead of the 2nd. Vehemently. Gotcha, As my reason was: Ownership of knowledge as I never reasoned WHEN the citizens knew versus when we signed it! Citizens cannot act unless they know, can they? I may have written it so created it but what have they created if not even a feeling as they have no knowledge what we signed or who signed it? 'When' does liberty thus justice exist? I told you as it is inalienable. It is. What actual Revolution is not acted upon??? An American coup, that's what kind as you biocentrically deny it is as you hate your parents and never studied constitutional law or if you did failed thus the problem with your parents is YOU, get it? Not me, not the law and not them. I smell a biocentric vote albeit completely unreasonable. You are not aware of YOU, so, according to you, you do not exist do you? Yes, as I just gave you knowledge about you so now you own an idea of you. Existence; I just gave birth to you. 