Grading the debate

Popeye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
3,023
Location
Washington state
By MARK HALPERIN / OXFORD, MISSISSIPPI Sat Sep 27, 3:25 PM ET

John McCain

Substance: His arguments were hard to follow at the beginning, but he found his voice as the debate progressed, although he never seemed fully in control of his message. He had plenty to say about the economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Russia, but often bogged down his own answers when trying to unfurl quips and soundbites. Stuck with bumper sticker slogans on the economy, and while he got a bit more detailed on foreign policy, he stayed at his usual level of abstraction. If he truly knows more about the world than Obama, he didn't show it in this debate.

Grade: B-

Style: Cluttered, jumpy, and often muddled. Frequent coughing early on helped neither his arguments nor his image. Jokes about being deaf and anecdotes about Normandy and George Shultz seemed ill-advised - even his pen was old. His presentation was further hindered by his wandering discussion of the differing heights of North and South Koreans and his angry assertion about how well he knows Henry Kissinger. Fell into the classic politician's trap of inserting familiar stump speech applause lines into debate responses - which only works if done with enthusiasm and clarity (and if received by applause - a big No-No in Lehrer's auditorium, which the audience obeyed seriously and silently). Keenly aware of the grand, grave occasion, McCain wavered between respectful and domineering, and ended up awkward and edgy.

Grade: C-

Offense: Emphasized his bread and butter issues of taxes and spending, and hit Obama on his failure to visit Iraq and his expressed willingness to meet with dictators. But while mocking his opponent on a few occasions, which reflected his acute disrespect for Obama, he did so in an insufficiently sharp and detailed manner - and unevenly worked elements of his rival's record into his attacks. Still he was utterly confident about his own experience, knowledge, and policies, even when tripped by his own tongue and distracted by the strains of debate practice. The main problem: Obama's obvious preparation and sharp answers contradicted McCain's frequent claims that the Democrat was uninformed and "didn't understand" key issues.

Grade: C+

Defense: He managed to ignore most of Obama's jibes, but was eventually baited into giving an extended answer about his policy differences with President Bush, after his opponent repeatedly mentioned McCain's regular support of Bush's budgets. Was visibly riled when clashing with Obama over a variety of issues, including Iraq, sanctions, and spending. He also chose to boast about Sarah Palin (although not by name) as his maverick partner, who, after her shaky week, may no longer be his ace in the hole.

Grade: B-

Overall: McCain was McCain - evocative, intense, and at times emotional, but also vague, elliptical, and atonal. Failed to deliver his "country first versus Obama first" message cleanly, even when offered several opportunities. Surprisingly, did not talk much about "change," virtually ceding the dominant issue of the race.

Overall grade: B-


Barack Obama

Substance: Quite manifestly immersed in the past, present, and future details of policy, and eager to express his views, which have been expanded, honed, and solidified during the last 18 months of hard campaigning. Still, he did avoid the nitty-gritty details of policy positions in favor of broad principles and references to working Americans, thereby not presenting the kind of specifics that some voters are waiting to hear from him.

Grade: B+

Style: Polished, confident, focused. Fully prepared, and able to convey a real depth of knowledge on nearly every issue. He was unhurried, and rarely lost his train of thought even when the debate wended and winded - and uttered far fewer of his trademark, distracting, "ums." At times, however, Obama revealed the level of his preparation by faltering over a rehearsed answer. He seemed to deliberately focus on the moderator and the home audience, with McCain as an afterthought - except when on the attack. Chose to avoid humor, for the most part, in favor of a stern demeanor, and in the process, came off as cool as a cucumber.

Grade: A

Offense: Linking McCain to Bush in his very first answer, he kept it up as his primary line of attack. Forcefully hit McCain for his early support of the Iraq War. Though he never drew blood, he did keep McCain a bit off balance, often with clever references to McCain's recent statements.

Grade: B

Defense: Had a reasonable answer for every charge that came his way - with little anger, bluster, or anxiety. Often interrupting McCain attacks with swift explanations and comebacks, he managed to spin accusations of being liberal as evidence of his relentless opposition to George Bush (in replies that were clearly planned). Offered a rather clumsy alternative to McCain's well-known, moving story of wearing the bracelet of a soldier lost in Iraq (a gift from the soldier's mother), with a story about a bracelet of his own. Fearless, without condescension, he attempted the gracious move of agreeing with or complimenting a McCain position, occasionally to his own detriment.

Grade: A-

Overall: Went for a solid, consistent performance to introduce himself to the country. He did not seem nervous, tentative, or intimidated by the event, and avoided mistakes from his weak debate performances during nomination season (a professorial tone and long winded answers). Standing comfortably on the stage with his rival, he showed he belonged - evocative of Reagan, circa 1980. He was so confident by the end that he reminded his biggest audience yet that his father was from Kenya. Two more performances like that and he will be very tough to beat on Election Day.

Overall grade: A-

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/gradingthefirstpresidentialdebate

Ah victory...it has a sweet taste.
_________________
 
Werbung:
LOL-Substance-Obama = C or C-

and no way he got an A in style with all those Im about to crap my pants expressions.

You were hardly an unbiased observer, for whatever deep seeded reason, you hate Obama. You had already decided the winner before the debate started. In fact, it appears the McCain supporters felt McCain won, Obama backers felt he had the edge. The tiebreaker...polls, the majority of which show Obama to be the winner.

I thought this one comment from the debate grading was particularly noteworthy...Standing comfortably on the stage with his rival, he showed he belonged - evocative of Reagan, circa 1980. That's exactly what Obama needed to do, look presidential, and that's what he did.

I like this comment too... Two more performances like that and he will be very tough to beat on Election Day. because that's becoming real obvious.
 
You were hardly an unbiased observer, for whatever deep seeded reason, you hate Obama. You had already decided the winner before the debate started. In fact, it appears the McCain supporters felt McCain won, Obama backers felt he had the edge. The tiebreaker...polls, the majority of which show Obama to be the winner.

I thought this one comment from the debate grading was particularly noteworthy...Standing comfortably on the stage with his rival, he showed he belonged - evocative of Reagan, circa 1980. That's exactly what Obama needed to do, look presidential, and that's what he did.

I like this comment too... Two more performances like that and he will be very tough to beat on Election Day. because that's becoming real obvious.

You should pay closer attention to what I say before you try to put words in my mouth.

I started a thread called "who won the debate?" read the first post from me, I said it was a tie. I never went into it thinking anyone was going to win and I did no leave it thinking anyone won.

I think it was a tie

I am just not stupid enough to say Obama got an A in any part of it, Neither of them did.

They both at best got B's and C's, though I dont think either of them got a D in anything.
 
Come on Popeye, you have started other debate threads, why do you insist on continuing to make them. Post it in one of your other threads on the debate that you started.
 
Come on Popeye, you have started other debate threads, why do you insist on continuing to make them. Post it in one of your other threads on the debate that you started.

In honor of the upcoming VP debate, I give you your favorite air headed VP choice in the swimsuit competition:

 
In honor of the upcoming VP debate, I give you your favorite air headed VP choice in the swimsuit competition:


Does she have to dress like a man and have no fem qualities to be qualified as a VP

for someone who comes from the party that spews equality speech like vomit you are being pretty sexist!

Is she only acceptable if she is a dike who likes killing babies and higher taxes?
 
I wouldn't take anything MARK HALPERIN says seriously..

Grading the First Presidential Debate
Experts Analyze Body Language and Speech Patterns in the First Debate
By Sherry Rauh
WebMD Health NewsReviewed by Louise Chang, MDSept. 27, 2008 -- If you watched the first presidential debate between Republican nominee Sen. John McCain and Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama, you probably have your own opinion of who won. Maybe you even graded the candidates with WebMD's Debate Scorecard. Now you can compare your take on the use of body language in the first debate with that of the pros.

WebMD turned once again to the speech and body language experts who helped construct the scorecard. The experts, who are not affiliated with either presidential campaign, are:

Debate Coach: Kellie Roberts, head coach of the University of Florida's Speech and Debate Team.
Media Coach: Tim Koegel, author of The Exceptional Presenter.
Executive Coach: Carol Kinsey Goman, PhD, author of The Nonverbal Advantage: Secrets and Science of Body Language at Work.
[Do you have a health care question for the presidential candidates? Submit it here, and WebMD will send it to Tom Brokaw, moderator of the second town-hall format debate. Then watch on Oct. 7 at 9 p.m. ET/6 p.m. PT to see if your question gets asked.]

Debate Scorecard
After watching the first presidential debate, the experts gave each candidate a score of 1 to 5 in the following categories, with 5 representing the best performance.

1. Message: Did the candidates get their messages across clearly and concisely?

Roberts: McCain - 4 Obama - 4
Koegel: McCain - 4 Obama - 3
Goman:McCain - 4 Obama - 3
Average: McCain - 4 Obama - 3.3

"[McCain] was more definitive on the message," Koegel tells WebMD. He gave more specifics ... and did a better job of intertwining stories and examples."

"McCain had more stories," Goman agrees, and that's what people remember "more than anything else." The Republican nominee also had better sound bites, she says. But both candidates "lacked details, particularly on the economy."



2. Speech Pattern: Did the candidates sound conversational without awkward pauses?

Roberts: McCain - 4 Obama - 3
Koegel: McCain - 3.5 Obama - 3.5
Goman:McCain - 4 Obama - 4
Average: McCain - 3.8 Obama - 3.5

"[McCain] jumped in quickly," Roberts tells WebMD. "There was no hemming and hawing, no distinct pauses where he had to think about what he wanted to say." Obama, Roberts says, tended to "um" at the start of his answers until he built up some momentum.

3. Tone of Voice: Did the candidates sound confident, but not arrogant or angry?

Roberts: McCain - 3 Obama - 4
Koegel: McCain - 5 Obama - 5
Goman:McCain - 2 Obama - 4
Average: McCain - 3.3 Obama - 4.3

"McCain had the most problems, because he often sounded condescending or scolding," Goman tells WebMD. "Seven times, McCain said Obama just doesn't get it or doesn't understand. One or two times might have been effective, but seven was over the top."

Roberts agrees. "McCain sounded somewhat aggressive," she says, while Obama's tone "sent a message that he was in command, comfortable and relaxed." She added that Obama could have conveyed a little more emotion.

But Koegel says both candidates "were right where they needed to be. Had they exceeded the energy and passion level of last night," it might have been too much.
link:

http://www.webmd.com/news/20080927/grading-first-presidential-debate?src=RSS_PUBLIC

That's about as neutral and professional review your going to get.
 
Werbung:
Another lib "journalist" kisses obama's ass, and you expect anyone to read it without giggling? :D
 
Back
Top