Wanna bet? He posted this:
It's at the end of page 2, of 4 pages -- not exactly buried. He wouldn't be telling me to look up videos myself if he weren't convinced it would lend some credibility to his point.
It's not like I'm asking for rigid mathematical proofs here (I've already made clear I don't expect anything nearly that strenuous from the 9/11 troofer crowd). All I'm asking for is some reason to believe what he's saying has any validity at all. He has not even lifted a finger to provide anything in that regard. The closest he can get to it is a casual mention of a video which, he claims, has everything I need to be convinced of a conspiracy -- even though I have seen numerous such videos of the collisions on 9/11 and remain skeptical as ever.
ZOMG, I could throttle you ditzy libertarian nutbags every time you trot out your First Amendment rights, as if it somehow legitimizes your douchebaggery.
Hey, you're entitled to be wrong, stupid, unpatriotic, and paranoid -- I have not once questioned that. All I've done is exercise my equal right to demand to be convinced.
And for the record, if KoF would do anything like answer some questions or provide some items that support his opinion, we could've settled this dispute pages ago. Instead he's repeating the silly old "look it up yourself" meme, which I have done, and remain unconvinced that his point has any value.
