Have democrats commandeered the courts to issue unconstitutional edicts?

mark francis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
28,675
That is what it seems, especially since Schumer admitted the democrats have put judges in place to thwart conservative rules and laws. Here is what Justice Roberts said about Congress' exercising unjust influence over the courts:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...an-money-be-turned-over-to-u-s-terror-victims

Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal, dissented. Writing for the two, the chief justice accused Congress of "commandeering the courts to make a political judgment look like a judicial one." The Constitution, he said, "commits the power to decide cases to the Judiciary alone. Yet in this case, Congress arrogated that power to itself," tailoring the law to make sure that one side would win.

Judges are wrong to think they have the power to dictate to President Trump what he can or cannot support in the way of national or foreign policies. They are taking the position of Schiff's whistleblower, Lt. Col. Vindman that Trum does not get to decide what US foreign policy towards Ukrain is going to be, Vindman does the deciding.
 
Werbung:
That is what it seems, especially since Schumer admitted the democrats have put judges in place to thwart conservative rules and laws. Here is what Justice Roberts said about Congress' exercising unjust influence over the courts:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...an-money-be-turned-over-to-u-s-terror-victims

Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal, dissented. Writing for the two, the chief justice accused Congress of "commandeering the courts to make a political judgment look like a judicial one." The Constitution, he said, "commits the power to decide cases to the Judiciary alone. Yet in this case, Congress arrogated that power to itself," tailoring the law to make sure that one side would win.

Judges are wrong to think they have the power to dictate to President Trump what he can or cannot support in the way of national or foreign policies. They are taking the position of Schiff's whistleblower, Lt. Col. Vindman that Trum does not get to decide what US foreign policy towards Ukrain is going to be, Vindman does the deciding.
Has a democrat judge yet ruled that Trump's attack on Iran was unconstitutional? As if deporting illegal terrorists is illegal.
 
Have you ever heard of habius Corpus.
Obviously not.
Is every terrorist alien who sneaks into the US automatically given Constitutional rights protecting him from deportation until all the court remedies and appeals have been exhausted? Must all 20 million foreigners who illegally entered the US be given extensive court hearings or trials before any of them can be deported? Since when are illegal immigrants given habeous corpus rights in America in where democrats suspended Trump's due process in order to get away with their unjust and illegal impeachment attempt?

AI Overview

It is a matter of debate whether the House suspended due process during Donald Trump's second impeachment
.
AI Overview

Alan Dershowitz has argued that the House of Representatives suspended due process during Donald Trump's second impeachment
. According to Dershowitz, the House denied the president and his legal team the chance to present a defense or contest the article of impeachment. He also contended that attempting to try Trump in the Senate after he left office went against the provision for removing a sitting president. Dershowitz also claimed that a Senate trial of a private citizen, even a former president, would violate the prohibition against bills of attainder.
 
Is every terrorist alien who sneaks into the US automatically given Constitutional rights protecting him from deportation until all the court remedies and appeals have been exhausted? Must all 20 million foreigners who illegally entered the US be given extensive court hearings or trials before any of them can be deported? Since when are illegal immigrants given habeous corpus rights in America in where democrats suspended Trump's due process in order to get away with their unjust and illegal impeachment attempt?

AI Overview

It is a matter of debate whether the House suspended due process during Donald Trump's second impeachment
.
AI Overview

Alan Dershowitz has argued that the House of Representatives suspended due process during Donald Trump's second impeachment
. According to Dershowitz, the House denied the president and his legal team the chance to present a defense or contest the article of impeachment. He also contended that attempting to try Trump in the Senate after he left office went against the provision for removing a sitting president. Dershowitz also claimed that a Senate trial of a private citizen, even a former president, would violate the prohibition against bills of attainder.


Is every terrorist alien
Where's the evidence they were all terrorists?

who sneaks into the US automatically given Constitutional rights protecting him from deportation until all the court remedies and appeals have been exhausted

You conveniently forgetting they were not all illegals. They have the right but not according to fascist dictators who sucks up to ratbag homophobes like you.
 
Werbung:
Is every terrorist alien
Where's the evidence they were all terrorists?

who sneaks into the US automatically given Constitutional rights protecting him from deportation until all the court remedies and appeals have been exhausted

You conveniently forgetting they were not all illegals. They have the right but not according to fascist dictators who sucks up to ratbag homophobes like you.
Who said they were all terrorists? I'll ask again, is every terrorist who sneaks into the US illegally to be supported by the US government like the Boston bombers were and then given full rights as if US citizens and protected from deportation by extended legal processes that may take years and cost millions of dollars before they can be deported?
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top