Reply to thread

But PLC1 doesn't look at the issue in a rational way.  He, like you and most believers look at it as a political issue.  This is a scientific issue, therefore the only rational way to look at it is in a scientific way.  Statements by political bodies that don't include hard science for support are meaningless and amount to nothing more than fallacious appeals to authority.


Those organizations can't lay out a single shred of hard, observed, repeatable evidence that establishes a solid link between the activities of man and the changing climate' or name a single physical law that supports and predicts the catastrophe that they are warning.  That being the state of things, why would a rational person believe what they have to say?


Back
Top