Reply to thread

Firbs story? Oh, yes, the right wing blog. Let's see, it says..




So, "far" less global warming than "alarmists" have claimed.  "Alarmists"?  Even the right wing bloggers are no longer claiming that global warming isn't real, or that human activities aren't accelerating it?




That one isn't on the CERN website, but at last, it isn't a right wing blogger's notions either.  It says:




I do remember this one.  Actually, global climate scientists, not "alarmists" and not "skeptics" have been saying all along that a part of global warming is due to human activities.  There are no "alarmist" scientific organizations claiming that "all of 20th century warming, and more, was due to anthropogenic effects".  Yes, there is some question as to just how much human activities are accelerating the trend.  "all and more"?? More than 100%?  Like most of the silly bloggers and pundits, that one doesn't make a lot of sense either. 




Then, let's try to find a scientific organization that says that global warming is not real.  so far, nothing. 


.

"warmers"? 

Is that leg warmers, or mittens, or just what?

well, you do have to have the right eyewear.  Let's see, where did I put my left/right 3D glasses? I'm sure they're here somewhere.

Just to clarify.. is the current acceptable position of real conservatives:

1.  Global warming isn't real, or

2.  It's happening, but human activities don't have anything to do with it?

I've given up trying to divine how this is a right vs. left issue.


Back
Top