OMG! You've written yet another chapter! Well, let's see if there is anything new here this time:
If there isn't any single number, why are you so sure that the model is so badly flawed? Your entire argument centers around the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth as shown in a model made to help laymen like me understand what global warming is all about. You've said that the number is based on a flat Earth. Yet, there is no single number?
Exactly. And the figure you're having so much trouble with doesn't. Therefore, your assertion about NASA and the flat Earth is just hooey.
Nothing new there. Same old, same old, the Earth is a sphere, so that means calcullating the amount of energy reaching it is very complex, and way over my head.
Nothing new there, either. If there is no single number, what makes you so sure that the one used in the model is so far off as to show that the scientists who devised it are trying to put one over on us?
That makes no sense at all, and the flat Earth model has already been discussed.
I don't know... your wacky conspiracy theory?
Well, so let's take a look at it then.
