Reply to thread

We haven't even got to the point to where we can talk about why kiehl - trenberth's energy budget might have been accepted and used as a basis for AGW alarmism.  As to the facts of the energy budget as I have laid out, there is no theory there.  What I have told you about the energy budget so far is fact.  If you believe I have attempted to mislead you on the formulae I have provided, then state exactly where you believe I am wrong and show me how you believe what I have presented is different from the formula that kiehl - trenberth use.

 

Your weak response isn't fooling anyone.  You have made it more than obvious that the topic is indeed way over your head.

 


 

Till you can grasp the basics, the conversation can not proceed.

 


 

But DAMN you are stupid.  How many times does it have to be explained to you that this discussion is not about how much energy is reaching the earth.  It is about the fact that kiehl - trenbert have it illuminating the entire earth at the same time and the only way to do that is to have a flat earth.  If you can't grasp even that most basic fact, how do you believe you could possibly rationally discuss the more complex issues.


Back
Top