Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Yes, you have misinterpted my words. Damn but you are dishonest. Take a look at the chart again: How much energy does it show coming in? Looks like 341 to me, how about you? What is the solar constant? Somewhere between 1364 and 1370 depending on the source? What is 341 multiplied by 4? Seems that it is something like 1364? Is that or is that not, 4 times what is being shown on the chart? Did I at any time state that they had the wrong amount of energy coming in from the sun? Of course I didn't and you claimed that I did. I tried repeatedly to explain to you why the actual amount of energy coming in was divided by 4 and you still fail to grasp what you were told and have resorted to bald faced dishonesty in an effort to extricate yourself from an argument that you are not intellectually prepared to engage. Unlike you, I actually can do, and understand the math. You said: Then did I or did I not go to great lengths to try and explain to you what the /4 meant? I told you repeatedly that the /4 wasn't something that was being done to the solar constant. I told you that it was something being done to the surface the energy from the sun was irradiating. You can't take my words far enough out of context to make yourself appear honest PLC. You lied, and then clearly misrepresented what I said. It's probably best for you to bow out and sneak away before you come out looking worse than you already do.
Yes, you have misinterpted my words. Damn but you are dishonest.
Take a look at the chart again:
How much energy does it show coming in? Looks like 341 to me, how about you? What is the solar constant? Somewhere between 1364 and 1370 depending on the source? What is 341 multiplied by 4? Seems that it is something like 1364? Is that or is that not, 4 times what is being shown on the chart? Did I at any time state that they had the wrong amount of energy coming in from the sun? Of course I didn't and you claimed that I did. I tried repeatedly to explain to you why the actual amount of energy coming in was divided by 4 and you still fail to grasp what you were told and have resorted to bald faced dishonesty in an effort to extricate yourself from an argument that you are not intellectually prepared to engage. Unlike you, I actually can do, and understand the math.
You said:
Then did I or did I not go to great lengths to try and explain to you what the /4 meant? I told you repeatedly that the /4 wasn't something that was being done to the solar constant. I told you that it was something being done to the surface the energy from the sun was irradiating.
You can't take my words far enough out of context to make yourself appear honest PLC. You lied, and then clearly misrepresented what I said. It's probably best for you to bow out and sneak away before you come out looking worse than you already do.
[/QUOTE]