Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
And conveniently failed to mention the very long explanation I went into in which I explained that you could in fact, multiply the amount of energy shown on the graphic by 4 and get the actual solar constant. Anyone who cares to look at post 242 in this thread can readily see exactly how dishonest you actually are. More dishonesty on your part. You didn't have to look in my head to se what I meant, I wrote 7 paragraphs explaining exactly what I meant. And you further lie when you characterize a discussion of the math used to build a model as a conspiracy theory. In fact, I don't beleive any part of your argument to date has been honest. Answer the question yourself. What is the number shown on the graphic? What is the solar constant? Are they the same? Have I, or have I not gone to great lengths to explain the math and why the numbers aren't the same, which is clearly over your head to you in simple terms? I have made it clear. At this time, you seem to be the only one who doesn't get it. I have received IM's from people who aren't math people who understand perfectly what I have been saying. You have been getting clear answers all along. Either you are to stupid to understand or not willing to give up your faith. You tell me which it is.
And conveniently failed to mention the very long explanation I went into in which I explained that you could in fact, multiply the amount of energy shown on the graphic by 4 and get the actual solar constant. Anyone who cares to look at post 242 in this thread can readily see exactly how dishonest you actually are.
More dishonesty on your part. You didn't have to look in my head to se what I meant, I wrote 7 paragraphs explaining exactly what I meant. And you further lie when you characterize a discussion of the math used to build a model as a conspiracy theory. In fact, I don't beleive any part of your argument to date has been honest.
Answer the question yourself. What is the number shown on the graphic? What is the solar constant? Are they the same? Have I, or have I not gone to great lengths to explain the math and why the numbers aren't the same, which is clearly over your head to you in simple terms?
I have made it clear. At this time, you seem to be the only one who doesn't get it. I have received IM's from people who aren't math people who understand perfectly what I have been saying.
You have been getting clear answers all along. Either you are to stupid to understand or not willing to give up your faith. You tell me which it is.