Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
If you didn't understand the math, why did you pretend that you did? And calling something so far over your head a conspriacy theory in a lame attempt to somehow try to save face is just dumb. Since you obviously don't understand the math, you, as I already pointed out, have based your postion on your political leaning rather than any actual knowledge of the topic. You are completely unable to disprove a single thing I have said which makes your claims of conspiracy theory pure bunk. By the way, you never explained how that equation represents the earth as a sphere. You never even got close. In fact, you never even addressed the equation. You stated that it did but by your own admission, you have no idea whether or not it does or doesn't. You can't explain the equation, you can only say what you wish it means. As to disputing every scientific organization on earth, don't make me laugh. I am only disputing the political heads of every scientific organization on earth, in many cases, not scientists at all. The vast bulk of the membership of those organizations are on my side. Those who depend on grant money are the only ones promoting AGW and the number of scientists who depend on grant money is a very tiny minority.
If you didn't understand the math, why did you pretend that you did? And calling something so far over your head a conspriacy theory in a lame attempt to somehow try to save face is just dumb. Since you obviously don't understand the math, you, as I already pointed out, have based your postion on your political leaning rather than any actual knowledge of the topic. You are completely unable to disprove a single thing I have said which makes your claims of conspiracy theory pure bunk.
By the way, you never explained how that equation represents the earth as a sphere. You never even got close. In fact, you never even addressed the equation. You stated that it did but by your own admission, you have no idea whether or not it does or doesn't. You can't explain the equation, you can only say what you wish it means.
As to disputing every scientific organization on earth, don't make me laugh. I am only disputing the political heads of every scientific organization on earth, in many cases, not scientists at all. The vast bulk of the membership of those organizations are on my side. Those who depend on grant money are the only ones promoting AGW and the number of scientists who depend on grant money is a very tiny minority.