That's not what makes it a conspiracy theory. Discounting anything published by anyone supported by government is one thing that makes in so. Asserting that you have something that the rest of don't understand is yet another. Asserting that the interest of the heads of organizations is giving governments what they want in order to keep grant money coming is yet another.
No, i didn't address your equation. I did, however, address the issue of solar radiation and the Earth as a sphere.
No, that simply isn't so. It's not non scientist heads of organizations who are publishing papers about climate change.
Even if it were, that's a lot of people who are promoting AGW in order to get grant money for their organizations, way more than could be in on a real conspiracy without blowing it.
But, if you think you have an equation that disproves AGW, by all means, post it whenever you want. In fact, why not send it to the climatologists who are toiling away under the supervision of the heads of organizations who are in on the conspiracy? Maybe they can get the truth out somehow.
