Reply to thread

Tell me PLC, do you believe that a model that makes a flat plane of the earth with no night can really produce a result that is anything like reality?  You accused me repeatedly of promolgating a conspiracy theory for no more than telling you the honest truth about the reality of the energy budget upon which the whole AGW scare is based.  It is upon that budget, and its 333 watts per square meter of back radiation that the whole manmade climate change hoax is based.  Without backradiation, there is no AGW alarmism.

 

Knowing that it depicts a flat earth with no night, are you still confident that the energy budget represents reality?


Back
Top