Reply to thread

Now that's an impressive list.  Considering that they represent some of the most august bodies to be found in science, one would think that any hypothesis that could garner such an impressive list of supporters would be a strong one indeed.

 

Surely, among all those scientific bodies, there must be at least one shred of hard, observed, repeatable evidence that provides a solid link between the changing climate and the activities of man.  Can you perhaps check among the people whom you trust so unquestioningly that you allow them to form your opinion and ask for such a shred of evidence.  I certainly know that I have looked, and looked for a long time and yet, not a shred of hard evidence can be found.

 

Would you like a list of scientific organizations that were on board with past hypotheses that turned out to be just so much pseudoscience?  There are many such lists buried back there in the past and on some future date, the list of those who believed in the hypothesis of AGW will join them.

 

Now, about that evidence.  Just one piece.  Surely you can provide something.