Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

[quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301]
Before a link can be even suggested, the changing climate has to be acknowledged.

Name a time in earth history when the climate was static.

[quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] addressed above.[/quote]

You shuck and jive, duck and cover, dodge and weave, but rarely, if ever do you actually address anyting.

[quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] Yes, I do remember a statement to that effect. The only greenhouse gas in existence is water vapor.

Really?[/quote]

Really. Unless of course you believe you have some evidence that CO2 or any of the other so called greenhouse gasses can absorb and retain heat. I would be interested in seeing that. You might look at their absorption spectra and then look at their emission spectra. Note that the emission spectra of CO2, et al are all exact opposites of their absorption spectra. That tells us that IR is absorbed and emitted immediately with no retention of energy. IR passes through them at, or near the speed of light.

[quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] well un rebutted according to your opinion, but then, that is not possible is it?[/quote]

Unrebutted according to direct observation. Where did you counter any of the formulae presented or offer alternate equations or specific alternate explanations for the equations presented? Nowhere that I can see and since my argument has been math based, only a math based rebuttal is possible. Anything else, I'm afraid, is just so much talk that never addressed the argument put to you.

Now, about that hard evidence that supposedly convinced all those scientific bodies that AGW was real. Any luck? Anything that is even approaching the limits of natural variability?

[/QUOTE]

<blockquote data-quote="palerider" data-source="post: 179615" data-attributes="member: 176">[quote=&quot;PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301]Before a link can be even suggested, the changing climate has to be acknowledged.</blockquote>Name a time in earth history when the climate was static.&nbsp;&nbsp; [quote=&quot;PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] addressed above.[/quote]&nbsp;You shuck and jive, duck and cover, dodge and weave, but rarely, if ever do you actually address anyting. &nbsp;[quote=&quot;PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301]&nbsp; Yes, I do remember a statement to that effect. The only greenhouse gas in existence is water vapor.Really?[/quote]Really.&nbsp; Unless of course you believe you have some evidence that CO2 or any of the other so called greenhouse gasses can absorb and retain heat.&nbsp; I would be interested in seeing that.&nbsp; You might look at their absorption spectra and then look at their emission spectra.&nbsp; Note that the emission spectra of CO2, et al are all exact opposites of their absorption spectra.&nbsp; That tells us that IR is absorbed and emitted immediately with no retention of energy.&nbsp; IR passes through them at, or near the speed of light.&nbsp;&nbsp;[quote=&quot;PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301]&nbsp; &nbsp; well un rebutted according to your opinion, but then, that is not possible is it?[/quote]&nbsp;Unrebutted according to direct observation.&nbsp; Where did you counter any of the formulae presented or offer alternate equations or specific alternate explanations for the equations presented?&nbsp; Nowhere that I can see and since my argument has been math based, only a math based rebuttal is possible.&nbsp; Anything else, I&#039;m afraid, is just so much talk that never addressed the argument put to you. &nbsp;Now, about that hard evidence that supposedly convinced all those scientific bodies that AGW was real.&nbsp; Any luck?&nbsp; Anything that is even approaching the limits of natural variability?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="palerider, post: 179615, member: 176"] [quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] Before a link can be even suggested, the changing climate has to be acknowledged. [/quote] Name a time in earth history when the climate was static. [quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] addressed above.[/quote] You shuck and jive, duck and cover, dodge and weave, but rarely, if ever do you actually address anyting. [quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] Yes, I do remember a statement to that effect. The only greenhouse gas in existence is water vapor. Really?[/quote] Really. Unless of course you believe you have some evidence that CO2 or any of the other so called greenhouse gasses can absorb and retain heat. I would be interested in seeing that. You might look at their absorption spectra and then look at their emission spectra. Note that the emission spectra of CO2, et al are all exact opposites of their absorption spectra. That tells us that IR is absorbed and emitted immediately with no retention of energy. IR passes through them at, or near the speed of light. [quote="PLC1, post: 179614, member: 301] well un rebutted according to your opinion, but then, that is not possible is it?[/quote] Unrebutted according to direct observation. Where did you counter any of the formulae presented or offer alternate equations or specific alternate explanations for the equations presented? Nowhere that I can see and since my argument has been math based, only a math based rebuttal is possible. Anything else, I'm afraid, is just so much talk that never addressed the argument put to you. Now, about that hard evidence that supposedly convinced all those scientific bodies that AGW was real. Any luck? Anything that is even approaching the limits of natural variability? [/QUOTE]

Verification