When did I ever say that the climate is static? I said that at present we can't say for sure whether it is warming or cooling because there is to great a margin of error to make a claim of a fraction of a degree in any direction with any confidence at all.
That is nothing but your inherent dishonesty, or simple inability to comprehend the words you read talking. My argument hasn't changed from the first post.
Don't condesend to me. You aren't even able to rebut arguments involving basic algegra. The very idea that you might understand more on this topic than me is laughable.
There are other gasses that can absorb radiation, but they all emit exactly as much as they absorb. The radiation passes through them at, or very near the speed of light with no energy retention.
Nice that you can quote from scripture. Alas, you don't have a clue what it means. It certainly doesn't mean that CO2, or any other greenhouse gas, including water vapor can radiate energy back to the warmer surface of the earth.
Feel free to show an equation that is not a corruption of a physical law that would allow energy from the cooler atmosphere to radiate back to the warmer earth. Quoting scripture, that you clearly aren't able to understand isn't impressive.
Now, about that hard, observeable, repeatable evidence that establishes a hard link between the activities of man and the changing climate? I can't help but notice that you are still shucking and jiving but not providing even the smallest shred of evience to support the claim that man is altering the global climate. Surely there must be something readily accessable if all those scientific bodies are on the bandwagon. Where is it?
