Reply to thread

Near as I can tell the AGW idea is keyed to:

a) the greenhouse gas effect

b) the "Hockey Stick" graph

 

The former is a presumption widely accepted but seems to have some issues that some are having problems with.  The latter purports to show a relationship between increased CO2 in the atmosphere and temperature change.  This seems to have issues based on an arbitrary timeline, undefined massaging of data and revelations of internal shenanigans among it's proponents.

 

Seems at the very least we don't have very solid ground to stand upon as evidence of any need of dramatic change.  Seems at the very worst we have a serious problem with the relationship between science and government.

 

Maybe The Gipper was right to note that government is the problem, not the solution.


Back
Top