Because there is no such endorsement.
Because modern political dynamics is simply different from that occuring 3000 years ago.
Because explaining the bible via hermeneutics is much more sensible than editing it.
Take your pick.
And if you still don't get it, why not blame the jews for a change. After all, they're the ones serious about mosaic law.
If the bible were the 'infallible' word of god, then there would be no need for tradition -- the other half from which divine inspiration is supposed to be coming from.
The thing is, salvation HISTORY simply doesn't make sense if god's self-revelation abruptly stopped with the acts of the apostles 2000 yrs ago, does it? Nor would it make any sense if it were presented independent of the millieu in which it happened, would it?
In fact, god's self-revelation, from the same dogma you are so averse to, is an on-going process. Heck, even science is a venue fo god's self-revelation.
Yes, it is so complex and you are arguing from a position of ignorance.
