When have I said that you label ALL others as liars and haters? I have said that you label many who disagree with you as liars and haters. I might have even used a generalization, and of course people know that generalization are meant to be taken generally and do not imply ALL. But you have used the word all. Does that make you a liar?
I am not so special. You have called several others liars and haters. Does that make you a liar?
I am continually impressed with the quality of the arguments that come from many people on this board. I am often impressed by those I don't agree with. I am even at times impressed by those who are clearly uneducated but nevertheless are good thinkers and say good things. I am sorry you do not have the same respect for the intellectual abilities of so many here.
I have never said you are less than based on your orientation or "gender."
Inadvertently calling you a he (when you are in fact genetically a he) when I intended to avoid the issue out of respect is not in fact disrespectful. I have called you angry and bitter and wrong and a bunch of other stuff. But it has been spoken in truth and without malice.
Did you know that I have inadvertently called other males here she and other females here he? I usually only pay attention to the post and not so much to who makes them.
You either already have the same rights or do not have the same rights for logical reasons just like blind folks cannot drive for logical reasons.
I would like to see the state get out of the marriage license business for all so I advocate the only system that would grant rights equally. You would extend an unfair system of granting rights and licenses upon just one or two more groups while continuing to exclude other groups.
Would anyone want to make a gentleman's wager that this will not be the last time MT addresses me? It's not like MT has not said repeatedly that I would not be addressed.
