How about "Retroactive" Abortion?

always

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2009
Messages
1,143
Most all of humanity agree that ABORTION is indeed "Cruel and Unusual " Punishment! It murders a life before that life is given his/her Birth Right!
But as we now see there are millions of situations where most evils that harm the human race are caused by those who survived the birth process and due to their personal choice or choices became useless, a drag on society , and harmful to the rest of a civivized society. Due to their political choices, their health choices, and their lack of any positive educational choices ,they have become a blight on the general population.
So, it does appear that it is legal to destroy a life that has not yet had a chance to show his/ her talents.Since this is true , Why not allow a "RETROACTIVE" ABORTION process to rid our society of our real and tested failures?ie radical democrats leftist, radical republican leftist, etc.
Currently NO test is given concerning the question of MORALITY when a innocent unborn life is murdered at any stage , from conception to birth, even after birth abortion aka "partial Birth Abortion" .
The process of "RETROACTIVE ABORTION" would not be so inhumane or brutal.While I am not suggestioning we adopt such a process, I do think we must compare it to what we now do and have done by murdering over 50,000,000 innocent lives just since 1973. Without any reason , without any cause , except that of personal selfishness. The "RETROACTIVE " process ,if one could be morally designed, would need to have safeguards that are absent in the current "murder by abortion" that is so popular in our sinful world today.
Some of you will say "Is this guy/ gal nuts? Retroactive Abortion? NO WAY!!
BUT please , compare it to what YOU do now!! Really the only difference between them is with the current destruction of human life, you do not see the life being destroyed , While in the latter case YOU would see the actual life and it could be in various ages of its life cycle. Not much difference ,is there?
Hopefully , as YOU study the question proposed , YOU will find in your heart to REJECT any thought of "RETROACTIVE " abortion AND at the SAME REJECT and STOP the current murdering that has been going on in America for the past THIRTY SEVEN YEARS!! Is not 50,000,000 little babies a humane place to STOP!?
 
Werbung:
No they don't...and, you can't prove such an opinion exists.

:rolleyes:

Hey, I have an idea. Next time we execute a murderer lets just spray him with acid, then draw and quarter him. Surely this numbnuts wouldn't think that is "cruel and unusual" since that is what they do to the unborn.

http://www.neusysinc.com/columnarchive/colm0047.html

In case you have been hibernating for the past year or two, I'll briefly describe the partial birth abortion. The "doctor" delivers the baby feet-first, until his whole body is outside the mother and only his head remains to emerge. The base of the baby's head is punctured from behind with a pair of scissors, then the scissors are opened to enlarge the hole. A tube is inserted into the hole to literally suck out the baby's brain, collapsing the head. Only then is the now-dead baby fully delivered and thrown in the abortion mill's trash heap (or perhaps sold to demented scientists for experimentation or commercial exploitation).

The Republican-dominated Congress recently passed a bill to outlaw partial birth abortions. Even many who often support "abortion rights" (for example, Rep. Lee Hamilton, D. Indiana) voted in favor of the bill. After all, what kind of a weirdo could favor allowing such a sadistic procedure? Well, some of our neighbors here in Indiana have the dubious distinction of being represented by a man (Democrat Peter Visclosky) who voted against the bill. And, of course, the 40% of Americans who sent President Clinton to Washington share responsibility for his veto of the bill.

As outrageous as the actions of Clinton and Visclosky may be, they are at least consistent. There is no reason for anyone to deplore partial birth abortions while contending for a "right" to commit other abortions. This particular procedure has attracted attention because the victim is so near being delivered unharmed. There may well be some pain for the child having his brain sucked out, but it must be short-lived. Victims of other abortion techniques are not so fortunate.

In one procedure, a concentrated salt solution is injected into the amniotic sac. The baby is killed by acute salt poisoning and is stillborn the next day, looking as if he had been burned to death. It takes the child about one very painful hour to die. Most other procedures involve crushing, cutting, or pulling off the baby's body parts and removing them with suction or tongs. No attempt is ever made to anaesthetize the child before starting the procedure.

Sound familiar? These "medical procedures" are all reminiscent of medieval torture/executions like drawing and quartering. We wisely refrain from using such barbaric punishments on even our most deserving criminals. We cry "never again" when we hear about the equally horrifying atrocities of the Nazis. Yet we sanction their use against innocent children. We even allow ourselves to be taxed to pay for many of these murders. May God have mercy on our depraved society.
 
Werbung:
71% of the people do NOT support partial birth abortion. Only the depraved like you would.

http://www.cirtl.org/abortion.htm

And, as the polls show, there is a growing opposition to abortion on demand itself.

http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm

Radical Liberalism is soooo SICK!! they will even consume their Young and ours!! Many of todays most powerful politicial leaders in our nation have the dark face of evil ! Is it any wonder America no longer recognizes itself!
 
Back
Top