Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
yes, in states where rates were already high the increase won't be as much compared to states where the rates were relatively low. the better solution would have been to foster competition between states so that the rates in high states would have gone down.regarding those with pre-existing conditions, a poor but better solution would have been to simply create a one line law that said insurance companies could not deny insure people with pre-existing conditions.Regarding the 45 million without insurance, first subtract those that have health care, then provide a means for them to join medicaid and pay what they can. At a super low relative cost they would all have health care which would have been a far cry better than the 30 million who will still not have health insurance under the ACA.Obama care is a mixed bag in the same way the prohibition was a mixed bag!
yes, in states where rates were already high the increase won't be as much compared to states where the rates were relatively low. the better solution would have been to foster competition between states so that the rates in high states would have gone down.
regarding those with pre-existing conditions, a poor but better solution would have been to simply create a one line law that said insurance companies could not deny insure people with pre-existing conditions.
Regarding the 45 million without insurance, first subtract those that have health care, then provide a means for them to join medicaid and pay what they can. At a super low relative cost they would all have health care which would have been a far cry better than the 30 million who will still not have health insurance under the ACA.
Obama care is a mixed bag in the same way the prohibition was a mixed bag!
