Reply to thread

The objections to insurance commerce across state lines in that link are ridiculously easy to overcome. By the way there are now less options available to consumers than there were before the ACA.


If not giving people with pre-existing conditions insurance is wrong then who cares what the insurance companies think or would go along with. A role of gov is to stop evil business from doing wrong things, right?


If on the other hand there is nothing wrong with denying insurance to people with pre-existing conditions then there would be no reason to make insurance companies go along with such a law. A system in which gov GIVES things to companies so that they cooperate with unecessary regulations is inherently corrupt. And here we have a sitution in which the thing that was given to insurance companies is the forcing of Americans to buy a product. That is inherently evil. the supreme court only allowed it because the method of coercion was a tax as if that makes it any better. Meanwhile I heard today that it just might be a federal crime to not buy insurance even if one pays the penalty, paying the penalty would be a "proof" that the crime was committed.


Back
Top