Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Voting fraud is hard to uncover, especially when the crooks fight like hell to stop investigations.https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2020/12/why-do-they-refuse-to-look-at-voting-machine-vulnerabilities/ 12-21-20Global Economic Warfare (by Secret Weapon Author Kevin D. Freeman)Why Do They Refuse to Look at Voting Machine Vulnerabilities?... 2. There are clear and undeniable statistical anomalies in 2020 that in the past would have been considered strong evidence of fraud demanding investigation.Not only is it true that the machines can be hacked or manipulated, it is also true that there is strong statistical evidence that they were hacked or manipulated. And the statistical analysis is the type that is used to identify fraud all the time and can be used in court as evidence.In 2012, the National Academy of Science published a well-researched report that stated without hesitation that statistical modeling could identify election fraud. In fact, that historically has been considered an almost universal truth. Prior to 2020, the only ones who seemed to disagree were those who were considered cheaters themselves.Here is my interview with fraud detector Jay Valentine whose team built the eBay fraud detection system and has been used to root out Medicare fraud. Here is an analysis of Arizona based on statistical evidence.Here is a thorough analysis of what the author describes as “the Dominion effect.” Also mentioned here. And another report. Ben Turner started his analysis in order to disprove the wild theory that Dominion machines altered the election results. What he found instead was clear statistical evidence that they did. Here is further evidence and analysis from an MIT PhD as presented in Arizona legislature hearings. And more analysis, as shown in charts.When you start with the premise that the machines are vulnerable to manipulation and then you see strong statistical evidence showing the huge probability that they were manipulated, that should be sufficient to take a thorough look see, right? ...
Voting fraud is hard to uncover, especially when the crooks fight like hell to stop investigations.
https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2020/12/why-do-they-refuse-to-look-at-voting-machine-vulnerabilities/ 12-21-20
Global Economic Warfare (by Secret Weapon Author Kevin D. Freeman)
Why Do They Refuse to Look at Voting Machine Vulnerabilities?
... 2. There are clear and undeniable statistical anomalies in 2020 that in the past would have been considered strong evidence of fraud demanding investigation.
Not only is it true that the machines can be hacked or manipulated, it is also true that there is strong statistical evidence that they were hacked or manipulated. And the statistical analysis is the type that is used to identify fraud all the time and can be used in court as evidence.
In 2012, the National Academy of Science published a well-researched report that stated without hesitation that statistical modeling could identify election fraud. In fact, that historically has been considered an almost universal truth. Prior to 2020, the only ones who seemed to disagree were those who were considered cheaters themselves.
Here is my interview with fraud detector Jay Valentine whose team built the eBay fraud detection system and has been used to root out Medicare fraud. Here is an analysis of Arizona based on statistical evidence.
Here is a thorough analysis of what the author describes as “the Dominion effect.” Also mentioned here. And another report. Ben Turner started his analysis in order to disprove the wild theory that Dominion machines altered the election results. What he found instead was clear statistical evidence that they did. Here is further evidence and analysis from an MIT PhD as presented in Arizona legislature hearings. And more analysis, as shown in charts.
When you start with the premise that the machines are vulnerable to manipulation and then you see strong statistical evidence showing the huge probability that they were manipulated, that should be sufficient to take a thorough look see, right? ...
