Then many went to trial ***** I was silly and gave you the benefit of the doubt that you meant a jury trial. Clearly I should instead have assumed you were a total *****
3xamples of judges ruling on so called evidence
[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.azmirror.com/2020/12/09/judge-skewers-gop-lawsuit-to-throw-out-az-election-citing-total-lack-of-evidence/[/URL]
Michigan Judge Rejects Challenge to Detroit Election Results
[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.courthousenews.com/michigan-judge-rejects-challenge-to-detroit-election-results/[/URL]
One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann wrote, so much that the court would have no option but to stop the certification even though it would impact so many people. “That has not happened.”
[URL unfurl="true"]https://apnews.com/article/judge-throws-out-trump-suit-pennsylvania-87eaf4df86d5f6ccc343c3385c9ba86c[/URL]
Wisconsin judge said Thursday that a Republican-ordered, taxpayer-funded investigation into the 2020 election found “absolutely no evidence of election fraud,”
[URL unfurl="true"]https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-wisconsin-lawsuits-presidential-16d90c311d35d28b9b5a4024e6fb880c[/URL]
And a summary
In a remarkable show of near-unanimity across the nation’s judiciary, at least 86 judges — ranging from jurists serving at the lowest levels of state court systems to members of the United States Supreme Court — rejected at least one post-election lawsuit filed by Trump or his supporters, a Washington Post review of court filings found. The Post found that 38 judges appointed by Republicans dealt blows to such suits, with some writing searing opinions.
[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judges-trump-election-lawsuits/2020/12/12/e3a57224-3a72-11eb-98c4-25dc9f4987e8_story.html[/URL]
Trump’s campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor in an amount equal to or greater than” Biden’s margin in Nevada, wrote state District Court Judge James T. Russell, a former lieutenant in the U.S. Army. A fourth-generation Nevadan, Russell’s grandfather was also a judge, assuming the bench after injuring his leg working on the railroad.
In Pennsylvania, Bibas — who sits on a federal circuit court, just below the U.S. Supreme Court — wrote: “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so.”
Writing on behalf of two other judges also named to the court by Republican presidents, Bibas, who graduated from Columbia University at 19 before earning his law degree at Yale, added, “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
So yes ***** fraud claims went to trial and you morons lost, and not just because of democratic judges duh
