What we are seeing today are judges ruling in accordance with their bias as opposed to judges ruling justly. In order to determine who is wrong as opposed to who is right, we need to air the disagreements in public so the proponents for or against the various opinions can be cross-examined as if in court for the American public to decide just as a court jury would.
Court Finds Arizona’s Signature Matching Process Unlawful in ‘Massive Win’ for Election Integrity | NTD 9-7-23
Court Finds Arizona’s Signature Matching Process Unlawful in ‘Massive Win’ for Election Integrity
Michigan judges declare that Americans have no right to have voter fraud evidence examined.
Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of 2020 Antrim Co. Elections Case - 9 & 10 News (9and10news.com)
Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of 2020 Antrim Co. Elections Case
April 21, 2022
9and10news Site Staff
The Michigan Court of Appeals on Thursday affirmed the Antrim County Circuit Court’s dismissal in the case of William Bailey v Antrim County, which challenged the 2020 presidential elections results.
In an opinion, Court of Appeals Judges Thomas C. Cameron, Mark J. Cavanagh and Michael F. Gadola, rejected Bailey’s argument that the Michigan Constitution, as amended in 2018, grants private citizens an individual right to request an audit of election results.
“This decision joins a growing number of court rulings that continue to uphold the legitimacy and accuracy of our elections,” Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said. “As we have remained from the very beginning, my office is committed to preserving the integrity of our democratic system. The panel’s ruling is additional reinforcement in this important fight.”
“This dismissal once again affirms not only the integrity and accuracy of the 2020 election results, but that those claiming otherwise will not be able to use our legal system as a vehicle for furthering their misinformation and conspiracy theories,” added Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson. “The court’s ruling is a heartening reminder that despite ongoing efforts to dismantle our democracy and make it easier to overturn future elections, the data, the facts, and the truth are on our side.”
Biased judge no doubt toting water for the Democrats who gave him his job stupidly claims there is no justification for holding up certification of suspect election results since the proof of voter fraud has not yet been submitted in the few weeks since the election. As though voter fraud investigations should only take a few days and be completed and proven in court in just a few weeks following an election. What nonsense.
Another judge who owes his job to the Democrat party issues a partisan ruling that is contradicted by evidence he does not refute.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Bans Drop Boxes, Suggests Biden’s 2020 Victory Was “Illegitimate” (msn.com) 7-8-22
In spite of all the judges who stood with Democrats resisting and obstructing voting fraud investigations, the massive evidence of widespread Democrat 2020 voter fraud remains unrefuted.
Trump proved nothing in the few weeks after the election when these premature judgments were issued, but now after the evidence has become more widely known even leftist judges are having to reexamine their rulings.
I know this judge and Democrat leader denied that Democrats were committing voter fraud for several elections when he was committing voting fraud himself.
Office of Public Affairs | Former Philadelphia Judge of Elections Convicted of Conspiring to Violate Civil Rights and Bribery | United States Department of Justice
Former Philadelphia Judge of Elections Convicted of Conspiring to Violate Civil Rights and Bribery
Thursday, May 21, 2020
has been convicted for his role in accepting bribes to cast fraudulent ballots and certifying false voting results during the 2014, 2015, and 2016 primary elections in Philadelphia.
