Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Again, according to what evidence?A policy HE STOOD BEHIND STEADFASTLY.And you just weakened your own argument. Huckabee could have immediately pardoned or granted clemency to the man, but he allowed it to go through the proper channels in the parole system.Regardless, the cases are not different. Dukakis could have used better judgment and discontinued the furlough program. Huckabee could have used better judgment and stayed out of the parole process. They are both at fault. But you must try and separate Dukakis' actions because it would prove your hypocrisy. Nice try, but you're trapped.Ignorance would apply when it's applicable. If you vote yourself into greater debt, into more war, and into higher taxes - you are clearly ignorant. If you vote for candidates who have changed their positions - or don't have verifiable records - you are also clearly ignorant. Ron Paul has never voted for an unbalanced budget. He voted against the Iraq war. He has voted against every single tax increase. And he has never changed his core principles in upholding the Constitution. His supporters choose him precisely because they are knowledgeable about his record. Not because they're voting for who the media gives the most coverage to.It's obviously particularly galling to you that Bill Clinton will go down in history as a meaningless President - and will be known as the first elected impeached President.
Again, according to what evidence?
A policy HE STOOD BEHIND STEADFASTLY.
And you just weakened your own argument. Huckabee could have immediately pardoned or granted clemency to the man, but he allowed it to go through the proper channels in the parole system.
Regardless, the cases are not different. Dukakis could have used better judgment and discontinued the furlough program. Huckabee could have used better judgment and stayed out of the parole process. They are both at fault. But you must try and separate Dukakis' actions because it would prove your hypocrisy. Nice try, but you're trapped.
Ignorance would apply when it's applicable. If you vote yourself into greater debt, into more war, and into higher taxes - you are clearly ignorant. If you vote for candidates who have changed their positions - or don't have verifiable records - you are also clearly ignorant. Ron Paul has never voted for an unbalanced budget. He voted against the Iraq war. He has voted against every single tax increase. And he has never changed his core principles in upholding the Constitution. His supporters choose him precisely because they are knowledgeable about his record. Not because they're voting for who the media gives the most coverage to.
It's obviously particularly galling to you that Bill Clinton will go down in history as a meaningless President - and will be known as the first elected impeached President.
