coyote
No answer for the entropy law or the biogenesis law viloation of evolution?
Prions are a product of DNA. While they may also function as stand alone agents, they are the product, at some point in time, of DNA.
And still no code/langauge that you can prove developed without intelligence?
Could it be that no such code/language exists?
And there are still many physicists who subcribe to the theory that the universe has always existed. This is indirect support (and no doubt unintended) for the Bible's assertion that God has always existed. The Bible and many modern day physicists both say the universe has always existed.
My assertion concerning the existence of God does not require any verified laws of science to be violated. Evolution, which is an unverified hypothesis/theory, does violate 2 verifed laws of science.
Your comments concerning transition forms is an example of tunnel vision. Because you claim evolution has proceeded since the inception of life virtually every fossil should show some sign of transition. Every bird should be seamlessly evolving into Bird 2.0 and immediately into Bird 2.1. Every fossil (or certainly most every fossil), should show clear signs of transition. So why are these darn transition fossils so scarce? One measure of a hypothesis/theory is how well it predicts conditions. In this case, the hypothesis/theory of evolution is a lousy predicter.
Instead the fossil record contains very, very few transitional forms and most of those are disputed which means they are not clearly transitions to the experts. The fossil record supports Biblical assertions: Each species has a time on Earth and then extinction. Then a new species arises, seemingly spontaneously. The fossil record supports this position far more strongly than transition.
Transitions have never been observed, even in insects with short lives, and this is still an area of great speculation and no verification, even after 150 years. Speculation but no verification. No mutated fruit fly has ever turned into anything but another fruit fly. No mutrated fruit flies are birds or worms or fish or flowers. Only fruit flies. And none of the mutated fruit flies has ever demonstrated improvement. On the contrary, after mutation, they can't fly or are missing wings or have other serious impairments. I thought evolution required major improvements to be made. Bigger, stronger, faster, smarter. Instead mutations produce cripples.
And the possiblility of increasing complexity and increasing organization over time violates the entropy law of thermodynamics which has been verified. So your belief system is based on speculation and interpretation rather than verification.
coyote, your belief system is subjective when true science is objective.
Just for fun try this web site: randommutations.com. The hypothesis/theory of evolution requires random mutations to result in higher levels of complexity and higher levels of organization with passage of time. Instead random mutations produce gibberish over time.
Here is a quote from your DNA evolution story:
"TNA does not occur naturally today. Scientists have to create it in the lab in order to study it. Since we can't go back in time to witness the evolution of nucleic acids, we will never be able to prove whether natural TNA made an appearance on Earth. Indeed, says Eschenmoser, "talking about TNA as a a possible ancestor of RNA is actually premature."
coyote, has ANY leg of evolution ever been verified? 15o years and counting since Darwin and verification should just about be complete. That is, if the hypothesis/theory is true.
