What in heaven's name is your point??
Science is merely one of the many philosophical models we have. It operates under the ASSUMPTION that all phenomena are measureable. And when we come across something that cannot be measured, what then?
Even in our cosmological discussions, we have discussed phenomena that cannot be measured - planck lenght, time and energy, space-time singularities, absolute freezing, invariance of the speed of light, conservation of mass and energy - and yet, you are inclined to accept them as truth.
But, with regards to god's existence, the most common and universal HUMAN EXPERIENCE, backed with unassailable LOGICAL ARGUMENTS, you are quick to dismiss.
What is more absurd is that you use the scientific method to refute something that is clearly BEYOND its field of inquiry.
And you have the temerity to call my arguments spurious?! You need to re-take highschool science to have a better comprehension of what exactly you're talking about.
<LOL>
You call godel's incompleteness theorems a 'mathematical discomfort' and I'm the pretentious one?! Does it tick you off that the logical algorithm employed by your computer is finite?
And when exactly have I argued for christianity or any other religion, eh?
Is a metaphysical god necessarily a religious god, hmm?
