So, popeye.
Try to follow this reasoning.
1. There are no codes or languages that have occurred naturally. All codes and languages have been written by intelligence. If there is a code or language that occurred naturally, no one in the forum knows what it is.
2. DNA is a code.
3. Therefore, if no one can demonstrate ANY code or language that occurred without intelligence, why would anyone assume the basic foundation of naturalistic evolution is true?
4. And if naturalistic evolution did not occur, how did we get here?
All you have to do to destroy this argument is demonstrate just one code or langauge that you can present reasonable proof that occurred naturally without intelligence. Just one is all it will take.
It is amusing to me to watch all you God Deniers dance around this point and try to change the premise. I know you can't admit even the possible existence of a creator. But if evolution is true, can't you point out just one code or language that evolution says is common? I mean, according to the Darwin Kool Aid drinkers, DNA eveolved with only unfocused and random forces driving it. According to you Darwinists, human DNA with 3 Billion base pairs just arranged itself solely by chance over the ages. I think the chances of this occurring are so ridiculously small as to not merit serious consideration by any rational human mind.
Could it be that we God Believeres have a higher standard of proof for our beliefs than you God Deniers?
Try answering the challenge instead of dancing around the point.
