coyote,
Good to talk to you again. As usual, your arguments dance around the point.
You preface one of your statements "If we assume". I thought true science was about demonstrable facts that could be verified. You start this statment exactly like any other Darwin Kool Aid drinker - by making an assumption which you hope to be true but have no proof.
Natural laws are not codes or languages. Codes/languages require information to be encoded and then decoded. Minerals reacting with each other does not require encoding and decoding. In my first post I explained wht patterns are not codes. Chemical reaction are not codes either. Molecular bonds are not codes. They are physical realities but no encoding or decoding is involved.
What makes codes and languages different from physical laws is that information is involved. No information is involved in a chemical reaction.
What holds atoms together is a mystery and if you follow quantum mechanics at all you know this a deep, confusing and seemingly contradictory mystery. But there is no encoding and decoding involved.
Come on coyote. If a molecule as complex as DNA can evolve, then there must be thousands of other simpler examples you can name. Evolution of codes or languages must happen all the time.
That is, if evolution is real.
Hey, maybe it's not real and didn't happen the way you would like it to have happened. Maybe the only alternative to evolution (God) is too terrible for you to even imagine. I mean, God is not PC in the hallowed halls of academia. God is not allowed in a US courtroom and a US school room and must be driven from society.
You've tried but, so far, the gauntlet is still on the ground. Why don't you check out TalkOrigins? They seem to have pat answers for all you Darwin Kool Aid drinkers.
