Apparently nott.
Nonsense.
From wiki:
"A gravitational singularity (sometimes spacetime singularity) is, approximately, a place where quantities which are used to measure the gravitational field become INFINTE. Such quantities include the curvature of spacetime or the density of matter. More accurately, a spacetime with a singularity contains geodesics which cannot be completed in a smooth manner. The limit of such a geodesic is the singularity."
Are you still inclined to debate an EXPLICIT mathematical description? Do you have ample background on differential geometry to discuss geodesics with me?
LMAO.
density = mass/volume
In a spatial singularity, linear measure in ALL directions are contracted to 0 - which in geometry, means a dimensionless POINT, or (if you are inclined to think in terms of differential geometry) infinitely curved space. From the equation above, DENSITY APPROACHES INFINITY AS VOLUME APPROACHES ZERO.
You don't know jack ****.
You are patently confused.
The lorentz factor figures in SPECIAL RELATIVITY. The lorentz factor (gamma) = 1/(1-(v^2/c^2)^1/2 where v=the velocity and c is the absolute speed of light in vacuum. In special relativity, the expression for the lorentz invariant quantities of energy, mass, length and time DOES NOT INVOLVE GRAVITY.
The curvature of space-time is expressed in einstein's field equation (efe) as a result of GENERAL RELATIVITY.
Correct. The geodesic is smooth for a schwarzchild singularity at the EVENT HORIZON.
However, what do you suppose happens at the CENTER of a schwarzchild singularity, hmmm?
Please stop making a fool of yourself.
Matter and energy are quantized. They behave as particles with velocity - hence quantum mechanics. Any particle in an inertial reference frame is SUBJECT to length contraction. That is why the experimental confirmation of length contraction in SPECIAL RELATIVITY comes from radioactive particles from space.
Gravity, however, is not quantized. It does not have a fundamental, indivisible unit nor does it behave as a particle.
Capice?
LMAO. You are merely cutting and pasting without understanding. Only a buffoon does that.
From wiki:
The Dirac constant or the "reduced Planck constant", , differs only from the Planck constant by a factor of 2π. The Planck constant is stated in SI units of measurement, joules per hertz, or joules per (cycle per second), while the Dirac constant is the same value stated in joules per (radian per second).
In essence, the Dirac constant is a conversion factor between phase (in radians) and action (in joule-seconds) as seen in the Schrödinger equation. The Planck constant is similarly a conversion factor between phase (in cycles) and action. All other uses of Planck's constant and Dirac's constant follow from that.
LMAO some more. Again, from wiki:
Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time using general relativity yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. This singularity signals the breakdown of general relativity. How closely we can extrapolate towards the singularity is debated—certainly not earlier than the Planck epoch.
Now, unless you are suggesting a cosmology that did not come from a big bang, I'd say you have thoroughly made a fool of yourself.
