Reply to thread

I had replied to your last post,  and accidentally closed my firefox tab... ack.



let me try again,  I'll cover the basics.


First,   mass never is infinite.   a/0 is NOT "infinity" per se.  the math behind division by zero is a kooky bit.   Depending on your setting,  the definition changes.  In normal real numerics,  a/o is meaningless,  its not infinity,  it's simply,  nonsense.  It can also be the "not a number" number,  in other mathematic settings.  It can appear to be infinite,  such as in limits,  it'd obviously try to run off your graph forever,  but, alas,  it doesn't really work that way.  Of course you'll happily suffice with mathematic reasoning from 1500 years ago to supplement your skewed view.


You have two notes here in the beginning.  First,   you say a singularity has infinite mass and gravity,   yet you follow up saying,  density is infinite,  as shown by m/v,  yet,  what is m/v?   Inf./0?   You're mixing things up and making a real mess here bud,  sorry,  but you're way off base.


As for Lorentz and his contraction.   You say it's not related to gravity (although in your originally you DID say this O.o) But I'll bite.  ---


Gravity is a curvature of spacetime,  Gravity can be defined as velocity over time  also known as acceleration.  Here on earth?  about 10m/s is our the gravity.  Now what do you suppose is needed for acceleration?  Distance?  We're falling through curved space towards that which we're attracted to.  Now with a singularity,  chances while your buddy on earth saw you smash into the singularity years ago, due to spacetime being rather curvy due to the gravity you'd have plenty of spacetime to accelerate towards light speed,   either way lorentz is happy with gravity as the proponent of velocity.


 

As for Planck,  yeah,  both mean pretty much the same thing,  however, dirac's is still smaller numerically ;),  which is about as important to this conversation as you even bringing up planck,  which was totally misplaced in your original post anyhow.



as for the cosmological singularity of the big bang,  yeah we can't go back beyond the point where matter is compressed within planck's length,  simply because it's surmised at this point,  relativity fails and quantum physics comes into full effect,  and since relativity and quantum physics is NOT unified (as I stated)  Relativity fails :-D...


I'm not sure why you continue the attacks, calling me stupid doesn't make you anymore right,  and you simply aren't right.  I've not cut and pasted anything to be honest,  search for any bit of any of my posts and you'll find that rarely will any of it pop up anywhere in google,   You try to make things fuzzy with incomplete knowledge of how things work,  your physics suck,  plain and simple,  horribly,  stop trying.


Back
Top