Reply to thread

I'm sorry but I'm using the words here in the way it is supposed to be used in an academic setting.


A deterministic phenomenon is something that is governed EXCLUSIVELY by natural or scientific laws, no? It couldn't behave otherwise. What all the discussion in physics has proven is that this couldn't possibly be the case in whatever field of the natural sciences.


Even in what we consider as random occurences - they still follow some statistical or mathematical law that makes it predictable to a certain extent. But within a certain domain where all external factors are equal, all phenomena approaches absolute randomness.


Tell me, what are you inclined to call this absolute randomness, where ALL deterministic conceptions simply do not exist? Is that not the exact definition of FREE WILL.




I'm sorry but this simply is not the way to view thermodynamic models. Thermodynamics deals with heat energy and how it translates to a temperature change in the system. We know from einstein that mass can be theoritically converted to energy and vice versa. However, until that energy is released, it has NO WAY of entering into the equations of thermodynamics.




The electromagnetic wave equation was a response to your post. There is nothing in the article to suggest a thermodynamic model.


Back
Top