Reply to thread

Sounds incredibly like a variation of kaluza-klein theory - where an extra dimension is postulated. In the kaluza-klein coordinate system, you have a fourth dimension in the form of a spiral that contains a varying component to the speed of light. It intersects our spatial experience regularly, thus explaining the apparent invariance of c. The theory is rejected, btw.


Not to mention the variety of string theories where somewhere between 7 to 11 dimensions are postulated. And so, one can explain almost anything given this latitude in postulating as many dimension as possible.


But then, what does okham's razor say about parsimony, hmmm?


 


I have read it. I am skeptical of your comprehension of it and the conclusions you make with reckless abandon.


 


Electrical energy involves the MOVEMENT of electrons along a medium. To do so, you need to apply energy. And this energy can be generated by peddling on a bicycle or unleashing the gravitational potential of water. This fact does not change whether you think of flipping a switch or the operation of a hydro-electric dam. In cases like this, the CONSERVATION OF ENERGY is observed since you are merely converting it from one form to another.




I am familiar with the similarity of concepts. And in such a concept, the conservation of mass and energy is upheld. You are not CREATING energy, merely transforming it.


Herein lies the absurdity of your claims. Not only is it inapplicable as a thermodynamic model, it is as fallacious as cold fusion.




As opposed to you who would accept anything that strikes your fancy without a rudimentary comprehension of the principles involved. This fact is quite apparent in your ignorant statements like 'plugging in the fourth dimension' nonsense.


As I said, until you SHOW ME THE MATH (which your article conveniently does not provide), I can only do what ANY reasonable individual (including newton) would do - be SKEPTICAL.




You need to make it work first - in a scale millions of times what you can do in a laboratory. But I see the ignorant has nothing except his own delusions, so feel free pretending you know anything about physics.


Back
Top