Reply to thread

All big bang cosmology assumes a singularity - a situation where the fundamental quantities of physics neither exist nor is quantifiable.


The quantum uncertainties defined by planck constant expresses the limits of fundamental quantitites of physics to be defined in any exact way.


If there are inherent limitations in our grasp of physics, then there is simply no reason for it to be the absolute standard for logical proof, now, is there?




It has already been proven in philosophy.


And believing without logical proof is just as bad as not believing without logical proof.


Back
Top