That should be enough, but nevertheless, why not allow competition across state lines? That should be a given. The only problem is that the Republicans suggested it, so the Democrats have to reject it. Partisan politics are the real root of the problem there.
And they don't contribute to Republicans? Well, once again, it appears to be partisan politics that is the root of the matter.
Not at all. Everyone should have a catastrophic care insurance. Those who can afford it can buy supplemental coverage, but it wouldn't be an absolute necessity. It would be more like lobster instead of raman.
I think lobster and caviar are overrated, too. Fish eggs? yuck. What is a lobster but a big bug that lives in the sea? But i digress.
And if you don't accept that "collectivist morality", then you have to admit to the results. We pay for the uninsured now. If we quit doing so, then some people will not get care. If you're willing to accept that, fine, but don't continue to claim it won't happen.
Sure, in an ideal world perhaps, where companies never go out of business, reorganize, or find ways to purge their rolls of the older and more expensive clients, such a plan might work. In the real world, it simply doesn't work that way.
