Reply to thread

Its a question of semantics. Your still screwing an ANIMAL!! ;) That's bestiality to me and a sexual fetish. To claim some sort of relationship to cover up a perversion is typical denial with hopes of fooling people into excepting deviant behavior. One can then assume, using the same mentality, that a child of eight also has a right and feelings for Chester the molester, maybe we should let them shack up and marry?

 

We cant. Our society and our culture has produced a set moral codes. We would need to explore how moral is agreed on and created to get any answers on why we are not bumping uglies with Bambi.

 

To me it would be way more fascinating to ask why people feel the urge (the fetish) to touch mary's sheep. What sexual history they have or how it got warped into sexuality. I personally think its the taboo factor. If you made it legal the dirty, naughty, shocking, unmentioned, need the person had is lost. I feel they would choose a new perversion. So its not necessarily that nice tight ass on little boo peeps sheep.


Back
Top