Topically irrelevant, an unwarranted unrelated digressive diversion.
False.
The wrong answer is to murder people in their earliest stage of life to use their body parts without their consent to perhaps save the lives of others. Such ageistic justification of murder is simply and obviously wrong.
The right answer is to say no to murderous Mengele type embryonic stem cell "research", and to say yes to the new more successful methods of stem cell retrieval presently offerred by state-of-the-art science, methods that do not involve murdering anyone.
It really is that clear and simple, Hobo1.
Your idiosyncratic support of murderous abortion as a convenient method of birth control for you is blinding you to the simple obvious truth of the matter.
I'm sorry that people suffer painful debilitating disease.
But that does not excuse the Mengele-like murder of a class of people to fix these sick people up, no matter how young that class of people is.
Again, there are better and more promising stem cell retrieval methods than murderous embryonic ones.
It makes rational sense to stop murdering and focus on better methods.
It is good to want to cure disease and provide for death with honor.
It is, of course, wrong to murder people, no matter how young they are.
Sadly, sickness and otherwise premature death is part of the risk we take by simply being alive ... and we can improve our chances by taking good care of ourselves, eating healthy, getting plenty of exercise, etc.
But the quick-fix mentality that utilitarianly okays the murder of one class of people to repair another class of people is, in my way of thinking, abhorrent.
Erroneous, unjustified initiation of ad homimen.
Your projection is irrelevant, Hobo1.
And should you ever be interested in a more advanced course of study, feel free to visit here: A Conception's Right To Life, where you might truly receive the lesson in reality you apparently need.
