Dante, there are several contradictions in what you have said, so lets go over some of them:
The Consumer Class
I stated: Communism creates a three class system; an ever expanding class of consumers (underproductive and non productive members of society)....
The consumer class, as I call them, consume more than they produce, hence their class title. This class of people includes the elderly, disabled, mentally challenged, and anyone else who is unfit to work or has a limited capacity for work.
You denied that such a class would exist: "If you dont work, you dont get to consume.... The punishment for not producing is exile in the worst cases and not being aloud to consume most of the time." - Dante
I called you on that assertion by pointing out that to avoid having a consumer class, you would have to leave the elderly and disabled to die. At which time you backtracked on your previous statements and said: "If a old, sick, or disabled person cannot work, they will be provided for." - Dante
But that statement is in conflict with the following statement you agreed was accurate: "Socialism teaches life without production has no value."
Would there be a consumer class or would you let them die?
If you let the unproductive live, then you are acknowledging that life without production does have value. In which case, what value do the unproductive have in a society based on the principle of production being necessary for consumption?
Taxation and Slavery
Scenario #1: You have a job that pays you $50,000 a year but 100% of what you earn (produce) is taken through taxes and equally distributed among society. In return, the government provides you with the necessities of life; food, water, clothes, housing, etc.
Scenario #2: You have a job that pays you nothing, so you pay no taxes, but 100% of what you produce is taken by government who redistributes it among society and in return, government provides you with the necessities of life; food, water, clothes, housing, etc.
What is the difference?
Slaves work for no money, and have no individual rights, but their necessities of life, food, water, clothes, housing, etc. are provided by the slave owner.
A communist works for no money, and has no individual rights, but their necessities of life, food, water, clothes, housing, etc. are provided by government.
What is the difference?
The use of Force
You said: "If the burgousie dont kindly step out of thier positions of power, then they will need to be pulled out of them by force." - Dante
They have something you want, so you are willing to use force, and violate their individual rights, in order to take it from them.
What is to stop you from using force to get whatever you want from others?
What is there to stop others from using force to get what they want from you?
------
I will leave it there for now....