Reply to thread

Please explain how you processed this sentence:


In order to come up with this interpretation:


It doesn't follow, something is missing... What you claim is shown to be obvious by the sentence, is not. Even given the context you've provided, the two of us do not interpret that sentence the same way. Perhaps it is because I do not believe in God? I can make an educated guess as to how people who believe in God would interpret the sentence, and it seems they too would not see the same thing you believe is so obvious.


Also, I do not see what voting God as a judge is supposed to imply. He's not elected. Either you believe he exists or you do not. This of course begs the question, whom do you believe would be a just judge?


Back
Top