Jan 2010: China reforms its Health Care - by rejecting Free Universal HC Coverage

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
The wires have been full of China's government's recent attempts to reform Health Care in their own country. And unsurprisingly, the reports have been long on praise... but short on specifics. See a typical example at http://www.china.org.cn/government/central_government/2009-04/06/content_17559519.htm .

"Finally China will 'give' universal health care to its subjects", runs the usual headline, give or take a few quote marks. But the devil is in the details... along with a number of 500# gorillas in the room.

My wife is from China, born and raised in Shanxi province southwest of Beijing, who went to college in Bejing itself. She's now a naturalized American citizen (the requirements for which she fulfilled BEFORE she got married). When I commented to her that her former country must love the latest developments in the U.S. with universal Obamacare, she stared at me and replied that China wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole.

She was very familiar with medical care, and how it was paid for, in China a decade or more ago, because she and her family lived it every day, year in and year out. And since coming to the U.S., she has kept in close touch with friends and family members in the Olde Countrie, as China goes through the massive injections of capitalism the country has recently had, and the results of it.

In years past, she says, the larger cities had a system that was basically free health care for all city residents, unlimited. If you got sick, you went to a government-paid hospital, paid an up-front fee of 0.05 yuan (slightly less than a penny in American money), and all ensuing care, medicine, procedures, and even hospital housing and meals were free.

That was in the cities. Rural areas (which contained most of the population) in China got no government support at all. You bought a private insurance policy, if available. Mostly people just went to the local doctor and paid cash from their own pocket... or did without.

But what caused the new "reforms" China has been studying and recently implementing, was the huge migration of the country's population from rural areas to the cities. Health care in those cities was becoming extremely costly for the government to pay for. Bottlenecks and shortages were rampant, and rationing was routine, with mounting bribery and fraud, and a thriving black market.

The government is now congratulating itself for "reforming" the system. Finally everybody, rural or urban, is getting "universal health care".

BUT....

Their so-called "universal" program bears a striking resemblence to what the U.S. had fifty years ago, except for who is "providing" it. Everybody has a government-provided insurance policy - but it has a 1,000-yuan deductible (about $70 US dollars), which is about a month's wages for the average Chinese city-dweller, and far more for farmers and other urban residents. Prices being what they are for domestic consumers in China, most routine procedures cost no more than that, so people seeking medical care usually wind up paying for all of it out of their own pockets.

The next 1,000 yuan in costs, if you're employed by a large (and govt-controlled) company, is matched by your employer, so you essentially get a 50% co-payment for costs beyond the first 1,000 yuan. If your company isn't large (as most people's companies aren't), they don't match it, so you wind up paying 100% of the second 1,000 yuan also. There goes another month's (or more) wages, straight out of your own pocket.

And once you've paid for all that out of pocket, for the rest of your medical costs for that sickness or injury, the govt insurance pays for 90% while you pay 10%. Relatively few people incur medical conditions that require such complex, expensive medical procedures, but when they do, the government "helps" them.

So, with the highly-touted "reform" the govt is putting in place, government has changed from its old levels of assistance (no help for the majority of Chinese who live outside large cities, but virtually 100% payment for the small percentage who used to live in the cities) to new levels (no help for anyone, except the relatively few who get very seriously sick or injured).

In other words, after long experience, China has shied away from its former genuine "free universal health care" for city dwellers, now that city populations are exploding. In its place, the have implemented a policy very similar to American "Major Medical", where the private citizen pays virtually all his own medical costs except for the occasional very complex and costly major procedures. The only difference is, the Government is the provider of this Major Medical policy, instead of private insurance companies as in America.

Bottom line: China has found genuine "Universal Health Care" (where a single payer pays for ALL medical procedures large and small, all medicines, hospital rooms, doctor fees and everything else) to be completely unworkable, with costs going through the roof, shortages crippling the system, and mounting rationing and fraud creating huge black markets that make criminals out of people who only wanted normal medical care. And they have done away with that system completely.

In its place, they have set up the system that the U.S. had for years, before all the talk of socialized medicine began, medical costs were driven by people looking for the best care at lowest cost for themselves and their families, and insurance had a sound, rational basis.

Somehow I don't think these facts will be printed anytime soon in the flowery publications the Chinese government is putting out about its wonderful "reforms". And they certainly won't be printed in the U.S. mainstream press.

But get a Chinese citizen (or former citizen), bring them to a place far from the Chinese government's attentive ear, and ask them what's really going on, and how the new "reforms" in that country affect him and his family.

You'll get an earful... of truth, for a change.
 
Werbung:
My wife thinks it's funny, actually. She pointed out that the U.S. is rushing headlong into socialism, at the same thing that China, with its long experience with socialism, is running away from it.

She lived under socialism for many years in China, and is now wondering if Americans are completely nuts, or merely appallingly ignorant.
 
Some of the loonier leftists are trying to tell us that China's present increases in prosperity, are a sign that Communism and Socialism works! They're hoping that no one points out that the prosperity came only with large conversions to capitalism.

Unfortunately, that capitalism is there only because the Chinese Communist government has kindly decided to let it in... NOT because the govt was forbidden to restrict it, as was the case for this country's first hundred-plus years. The government there (and, increasingly, here) is able to crush it out any time they feel like it.
 
Some of the loonier leftists are trying to tell us that China's present increases in prosperity, are a sign that Communism and Socialism works! They're hoping that no one points out that the prosperity came only with large conversions to capitalism.

Unfortunately, that capitalism is there only because the Chinese Communist government has kindly decided to let it in... NOT because the govt was forbidden to restrict it, as was the case for this country's first hundred-plus years. The government there (and, increasingly, here) is able to crush it out any time they feel like it.

I believe that you are the first self-confessed Conservative to advocate following in the steps of Red China's policies.
 
Notice how he slips in "self-confessed" to imply something is wrong with conservatism, without actually saying that so he can be challenged on it?

And then refers to policies of "Red China" as though I were encouraging communism, when it's clear I was praising their inroads into capitalism instead?

These liberals just can't argue issues straightforwardly. Every thing must be implicaion, innuendo, skulduggery... because if they try to address facts directly, their agenda falls apart every time.

It's not easy being a liberal these days.

My sympathies.

Back to the subject: It's remarkable that the largest nation on earth, with more experience with communist and socialist systems than we'll ever have (I hope!), is abandoning a socialistic Health Care system since it costs far more than their govt can possibly handle... and we are missing this most obvious of warnings and plunging closer and closer to the very kind of system that RED China has decided isn't workable.

It takes a particularly obtuse and blinders-on government to make such a huge misstep, in the face of such obvious warnings. Alas, we elected exactly that kind of govt in 2008. Now we will pay the price.

Socialism does not work, whether you are China or the United States (or the USSR, where it also failed). Every major country thatt has tried it, got badly burned, and is now reeling away from it. But alas, one nation of fools is still rushing in where those who have tried it (hardly angels) rightly fear to tread.
 
Notice how he slips in "self-confessed" to imply something is wrong with conservatism, without actually saying that so he can be challenged on it?

Can a Consevative tell the difference between a "stallion" and a "mare"?

You are self-confessed or self-identified, if it's a good thing to you then the term "confessed" should not bother you, but if you have a guilty conscience I can see how you'd quail at the term. Self-confessed Christians are proud to be self-confessed.
 
So, there are loony leftists telling us that socialism works because China's economy if growing? Somehow, I must have missed that.

It is pretty obvious to anyone who is paying attention that China's economic growth is due not to socialism, but to a trend toward capitalism.

As for their free health care, of course, that isn't going to work as anyone would be able to tell you. There is no such thing as free health care, free education, or a free lunch.

The system described in the OP sounds a lot like catastrophic coverage for everyone. The reason we can't do that in the US is, of course, political rather than practical.

The closest thing we have to a universal catastrophic care is Medicare, which pays 80% of the medical bills of the elderly, excluding drugs. Most seniors have a supplementary care insurance that fills in the gaps, more or less. I wonder if the Chinese can purchase such an insurance package?

We'd be far better off if we would quit affixing labels like "socialism" to anything that the government tries to do and start doing what is practical and will benefit the public at large. That, of course, is ideologically impossible, and totally contrary to the imperative of discrediting other party.
 
So, there are loony leftists telling us that socialism works because China's economy if growing? Somehow, I must have missed that.

It is pretty obvious to anyone who is paying attention that China's economic growth is due not to socialism, but to a trend toward capitalism.

As for their free health care, of course, that isn't going to work as anyone would be able to tell you. There is no such thing as free health care, free education, or a free lunch.

The system described in the OP sounds a lot like catastrophic coverage for everyone. The reason we can't do that in the US is, of course, political rather than practical.

The closest thing we have to a universal catastrophic care is Medicare, which pays 80% of the medical bills of the elderly, excluding drugs. Most seniors have a supplementary care insurance that fills in the gaps, more or less. I wonder if the Chinese can purchase such an insurance package?

We'd be far better off if we would quit affixing labels like "socialism" to anything that the government tries to do and start doing what is practical and will benefit the public at large. That, of course, is ideologically impossible, and totally contrary to the imperative of discrediting other party.

Good post! In America it has become all about placing the blame instead of solving the problem.
 
Werbung:
The system described in the OP sounds a lot like catastrophic coverage for everyone.

Correct. A.k.a. Major Medical Insurance.

You, the patient, pay for all the routine exams, routine treatments, aspirins, penicillin, doctor visits for the flu, and burning your finger on the stove.

For a major injury or disease (pretty rare), insurance kicks in and pays most of it.

Premiums are correspondingly low.

It's still available today, from most well-known insurance providers.

Or it was, until Obamacare passed. Since it doesn't pay for sex change operations, or maternity benefits for single guys, it probably doesn't qualify, and so will go the way of the dodo.

The point is, this low-premium, doesn't-cover-most-routine-things is the ONLY thing the Chinese govt finds it can afford. That happens to be true for the Government of the United States, too. But the Chinese govt is the only one who has figured it out so far. Liberals in the U.S. Govt never will. They must be voted out if the government is to get back on the right track. Hopefully before they spend ALL of our children's and grandchildren's money on it.
 
Back
Top