Reply to thread

The purpose of the bill was to reduce the budget. Eliminating much of the collective bargaining was necessary. Whether or not the members of the unions paid their dues voluntarily or involuntarily, while important for other reasons, will not help the state's budget. It should have been a separate bill.


Prove me wrong, I am ready to be persuaded. But don't just say that it would tie he hands of the unions or make them smaller - it is not the states place to pick winners or losers or to decide how large a private club should be. (previously the state did pick winners and losers by making laws that caused dues to be involuntary and that was wrong)


Back
Top