Judge rules that voter IDs are good for protection against voting fraud.

[mark francis]

It is good to see judges occasionally who exercise good judgment.

A Judge Rules that Arizona’s Recently Enacted Voting Laws, Which Mandate Proof of Citizenship, are Not Discriminatory (DONE) (msn.com) 3-2-24

A Judge Rules that Arizona’s Recently Enacted Voting Laws, Which Mandate Proof of Citizenship, are Not Discriminatory (DONE)

 

[Phoenix68]

.

.
Why are Jesus-freaks so hateful of the I.D.s their God gave them??
.​

 

[Phoenix68]

.
Vote-by-Mail!!!!!
.​

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

It is good to see judges occasionally who exercise good judgment.

A Judge Rules that Arizona’s Recently Enacted Voting Laws, Which Mandate Proof of Citizenship, are Not Discriminatory (DONE) (msn.com) 3-2-24

A Judge Rules that Arizona’s Recently Enacted Voting Laws, Which Mandate Proof of Citizenship, are Not Discriminatory (DONE)

Well, they SURE AS HELL CAN BE discriminatory. If the voter cannot arrange to apply for his ID because the ID office is not available during non working hours, or if some forms of proof are not accepted ( such as birth certificates in foreign languages, or church birth registries). Use your head, Mark.