I wish I could likewise accuse you of ignorance, but frankly you have yet to respond to anything I've said in any of my attempts to engage you (here or in Libsmasher's chickenhawk thread), so I can't say that with certainty.
Here's a short list of my points in this thread you haven't addressed. You can insult me all you like, and I'll take it lying down, if you're able to address them to my satisfaction:
(1) You said the Wright issue was manufactured by the right, but the Hagee issued developed naturally. This is silly.
(2) You appear to have dismissed the Wright issue solely because it was, as you say, manufactured by the right. You offer no other reasons why it should be ignored. If it's a non-issue then it's a non-issue on the basis of its merits, not on the basis of who called attention to it.
(3) Though you never explicitly state it, the assumption behind the posting of this thread is that Obama's close relationship with Wright and McCain's seeking an endorsement from Hagee are similar enough to warrant direct comparison. This is objectively not the case.
(4) You've openly said you don't care about the Wright issue or the Hagee issue -- yet here you're pretending to care about the Hagee issue to score political points, precisely the thing you're accusing the right of doing. This is not merely hypocritical in its own right, but doubly so since the entire point of the thread was to accuse your opponents of hypocrisy.
(5) Since you object to my characterization of the behavior described in point 4 above as petty, I'm curious as to how you think it isn't. You haven't actually objected to this on any grounds other than that it's "personal," when I've already told you, it isn't.
Now I find it frustrating (though not personally offensive) that you have ignored everything I've said with some weasley evasions about how I've hurt your feelings, and then go on to say that I don't know what I'm talking about.
