Actually its a legal way of saying you have no case.
You want to go into a court room with the argument "the world believes there was criminality here?" How ridiculous is that. Public opinion is not what drives interpretation of law.
First problem, the United States does not recognize the World Court, therefore we would never agree to be subject to a trial there. Aside from that, you have made no legal case, therefore a trial is a waste of time.
Good, they will have hearing, and the United States will not recognize whatever they have to say, along with the UK. Both members of the Security Council mind you, that technically speaking can veto that court's decision.
Other names do not care about "what Bush did in the Middle East" when they are thinking about loaning us money. They care about the rates and the relative strength of the dollar. As for nations lending the US money. We have no problem obtained foreign credit, so apparently they are stupid enough.
No sitting President is going to take action that will weaken the power of his own office. Not even Obama. The World Court can have their staged play if they would like, but it means nothing in the real world.
They are not going to jail, regardless of what MSNBC might tell you. A court that the United States does not recognize have no authority to hold a trial like this. They can if they like, but it is all for show.
Do tell what laws you plan to try them under because so far you have made no legal case. Also, yet again, this court has no authority on this matter. You are of course welcome to continue to think whatever you wish.
