Your opinion is that Bush is a criminal, the law says he is not. The UN showing the world that it has no authority will not enhance the power of the court.
They cannot win. They could "try and convict" on some bogus charge and then be ignored by the United States. That is not a win.
Doubtful. No sitting President is going to stand by if a former President is detained in another country for a conviction (that you wont get) in a court that we do not recognize. No other country would honor it either. The precedence that this establishes is not good for anyone.
Perhaps you can make any legal case for a law that was broken. So far you have talked around vague interpretations of the constitution and said we have a moral obligation to convict. That means nothing.
The wars we are fighting are not the cause of our financial problems. If you think they are, that is your problem.
Now you accuse me of not being patriotic because I pointed out to you that you have no case? Pretty lame on your part there.
You are entitled to think whatever you want, however laughable your opinions are.
I stood in front of no line to stone Clinton.... but whatever fits into your preconceived notions of lunacy you are welcome to imagine.
