Reply to thread

It does, Sarah ran around the country saying so.


Did you not read my post. I said I give her a pass on the clothes, but the makeup and hair "artists" are different.


It obviously does matter because Sarah and everyone else who thought she was the conservative second coming bashed him for this.


Thier husbands have worked together for well over a decade. Thier teenaged children were obviously involved in a sexual relationship, while they were not close friends, they certainly associated with each other...think of it similar to Obama-Rezco.  


You must not have read my post. She is not only a drug user, but a drug DEALER! This means that not only does she engage in a felonious act through selling a black market substance, but she also does not pay taxes on those incomes. This is not to even mention the negative effect that spurring pharaceutical heroin has on the overall economy. Junkies dont produce much. She does nothing but produce more junkies. Figure it out yourself.


In the Govs, office? No. But she does create and enable the continued or new addiction to...basically heroin. I am not sure how you are sitting here trying to justify this, but that is on you and not me.


Back
Top