Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Now I see from newspaper articles that Ron Paul apparently did NOT support the use of sanctions. I stand corrected.Instead, what Ron Paul suggested as a means of preventing Iran from building or acquiring nuclear weapons, is or offer them "friendship".I think I almost prefer the sanctions idea. While useless, at least sanctions offer the ILLUSION of doing something that can work.But "friendship"?I was right the first time. If elected, Ron Paul will be the Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century... except Chamberlain's opponent didn't have nukes, and was still interested in trade with the countries it conquered, not 100% annihilation.Is it possible for an actual human above the age of 10 to be as naive as Ron Paul apparently is?Quotes are from the Boston Globe, http://bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2011/11/07/paul-says-friendship-could-sway-iran/31cyILneO0df9rh4ppdPXL/story.html
Now I see from newspaper articles that Ron Paul apparently did NOT support the use of sanctions. I stand corrected.
Instead, what Ron Paul suggested as a means of preventing Iran from building or acquiring nuclear weapons, is or offer them "friendship".
I think I almost prefer the sanctions idea. While useless, at least sanctions offer the ILLUSION of doing something that can work.
But "friendship"?
I was right the first time. If elected, Ron Paul will be the Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century... except Chamberlain's opponent didn't have nukes, and was still interested in trade with the countries it conquered, not 100% annihilation.
Is it possible for an actual human above the age of 10 to be as naive as Ron Paul apparently is?
Quotes are from the Boston Globe, http://bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2011/11/07/paul-says-friendship-could-sway-iran/31cyILneO0df9rh4ppdPXL/story.html
